STUDIES IN THEOLOGY - 12/26/2006 (Moses Finally Kicks Off! Again A Reference To Extremes In Right or Left)

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/26/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

By

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/26/2006

Chapter 34 of Deuteronomy describes Moses as finally dieing at the age of 120! Though I seem to recall other ages noted in past versions of the bible I have seen. Some ever quite old in modern standards. ~

34:06 states that the Lord buried him in a secret place. ~

It again mentions that Joshua will become a similar focal point - but then restates that Moses even knew the Lord face to face. And of course was a prophet, no less - claiming him unique in comparison even to the prophets being disciples of Jesus presumably - stating that there has never been another prophet like Moses. Wonders in the land of Egypt and Mighty powers in the sight of Israel! Of course this is long before the disciples of Jesus... but still a formidable statement none the less. ~

The book of Joshua begins with the description of Joshua taking charge as it were - but I find something else interesting in 1:03 of Joshua, which sounds rather similar to the basic idea of modern embassies, though somewhat out of context. ~

Especially in the development of the tribes of Israel disbursing long years later, in a similar context as previously exploring consistencies socially within such developments - it definitely seems a potential relation - especially given the saturation of the work known as the bible in popular Christianity as well as societies in general. ~

1:07 then perhaps lends some insight into the reasoning of extreme efforts to comply dually with the ill result of the curses; As instruction from the Lord, Joshua is told as well to obey the instructions and further it is emphasized do not deviate from them, turning either to the right or to the left. Further that such will render success in everything a person does. ~

I see this as meaning a few things - the first of which definitely corroborating a decided lack of effort to comply in extremes (especially for the prizes), then further that such an approach will fulfill the failures in smaller doses as well - being then carried along with/by both the atonement and the moderate success found in common existence with such instruction in mind. ~

This also means that those failures will be fulfilled so to speak - but also will then be seen as success in everything.... given that such failures are instructed as well within the same writ which commands compliance with the instructions. ~

Humble, productive living seems very much the underlying instruction here. ~

Neither an extreme effort to comply, nor an extreme effort to fail. ~

Turning to the right...left being applicable in that sense, I would think. ~

It even stresses to obey all of the instruction - which of course then includes the failures for which to atone in celebration (as has been described).

This aspect seems quite strange when looking at modern society and the tendency toward political extremes of one or the other. Tending to place those of such common success, between two extremes - both claiming compliance with something in one form or another. ~

The strange part of this from my perspective is in regarding the level of saturation and influence from popular Christianity - if only as result of the years of development. ~

It does present another similarity I would imagine, upon closer consideration in comparison - given that patterned motion I have noted in the non-linear sense - and further with the depicted changes to the tribes of Israel throughout this work. ~

That, being the noted potentials in political changes and further the developed diversities progressing through a process of divergence. ~

This of course being heightened and then re-focused with the introduction of previous consistencies, then in a future consideration from this point in the work - the introduction of even Christ and the disciples. ~

Then even more so in considering that social motion as per said influences - with the introduction of the idea of Christ itself then tending to one extreme or the other as per said divergence between old testament and those continuations with/within the seemingly greater influence of the new testament. ~

Which again, beyond the existing potentials politically between the tribes - then introduces an expansion of - onto, an existing body (being the Israelites in this instance). ~

In a broad sense, and regarding the initial tendency of the multiple/single point of focus - such, as would be the introduction of Christ, then seems as though it is another attempt to re-establish such a single point of focus. ~

Such is consistent with the existing pattern of that progressive development; Jacob(Israel), Moses/Aaron... Christ... (at this point with of course King David and some others within that developing motion) - the Christ aspect happening more within the motion of/with the developments pertaining to conquering nation(s) - even utilizing them in ways explored previously. Further though, within that instance and symbolism of Christ (as well as actions) - it seems in considering it - and in regard to that use of single point of focus - that such had perhaps polarized in the directions designed - within the tribes so to speak, as previously explored.

Then, with the symbolic representation of the tribes (being disciples), such was again set into another motion. Albeit a motion as can be discerned with/within the larger divergence, and not altogether being accepted within the larger body (as standard). ~

It will be interesting to study someday, the greater influences of the time - but it seems that the extremes in modern society are of such divergence - if only in said larger influence. ~

As a thought, the symbolism of the idea(s) of Christ - seems to present further a need to no longer attempt to adhere to the instructions previously presented, especially in the extremes - which suggests that perhaps the failures did arise to a degree that warranted some effort to atone for them? Perhaps in the conquered aspect, as well? (further studies)

The physical symbolism I can see of the crucifixion, briefly considering it - suggests a torturous bonding at the extremes - especially of right and left - which of course must not be of the previous instruction, as previously noted. ~

Within this comparison, such then suggests the extremes of right and wrong - which again, in understanding the previous instructions - do not exist in that sense. That is to suggest in such understanding, that to have failed in having any human failings, so to speak - is to have failed in the eyes of those instructions - meaning there could be no extreme of correct achieved, unless it was then relegated to/within the idea of incorrect in having done so through not adhering to the instructions. ~

Such I see as where the ill effect of/as result of the previously explored idea in extreme effort to comply, would arise. Such extreme efforts really then only becoming incorrect within themselves. ~

While it seems obvious that such a brutal form of execution/torture (crucifixion) was not of the Israelites (though having been brutal themselves), the symbolism presents other facets to consider within the existing motion (socially) of the time. ~

Physically, the symbolism suggests the extremes of right and left - as well as other extremes - suspending the body in a more centrist position, which of course in examining the previous instructions - through the tendencies of human nature, will have been most of the more successful/productive of the Israelites. (considering this at this point in the work itself).

This then physiologically - even sub-consciously tends to promote a leaning to either extreme in an effort to be the nails within the symbolism, as opposed to the body. ~

Again, such is in reference to the physical presence that thousands of crucified people would have seemed to represent in some level of perception. Again, aside from the potentials in/of transference as previously explored - and from a slightly different perspective comparatively with the previously explored rules within the work that such became an extension of. ~

Of course it is that I am speaking of quite a ways from the present area of reference within this work concerning popular Christianity. And even between this area and the introduction of Christ are other examples within the progression of developments. King David being one of them - and a rather good example as per productivity, if I recall correctly. Very much the embodiment of barometer previously explored, and as well very similar to that having been depicted as per king and the similarities such contains with modern political offices. ~

When considering these different perspectives in a non-linear sense as many of them echo through modern society - it presents an interesting visage to say the least. ~

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY; 12/23/2006 (Too Much Effort To Comply? More Observation Of Christ)

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/23/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

Too Much Effort To Comply? More Observation Of Christ

An Observation

By

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/23/2006

30:11 of Deuteronomy almost seems to warn even of too much effort to comply.

The tone of it almost seems like a hint in that direction.

Then 30:12 seems to again foreshadow Christ in some ways, almost contrary to the previous - seeming - reassurance of ease to some degree. ~

This perspective of course is from our modern day, long after the introduction of Christ - but in that almost tells then of a given level of failure of the tribes of Israel in that very introduction as it might relate to this verse in particular. ~

Did the majority of the Israelites fail to see the ease in which and with which such reassurance alludes to? ~

Was it only apparent failure with the conquering Romans filling the role of prophecy culmination - then forcing the application of Christ? ~

Further then, in regard to these aspects of again reasserting attention to commands and decrees which some would argue are/were unreasonable/impossible to fulfill - that perhaps, as briefly stated, the work itself could hold the potentials of a sort of psychological warfare - being, within consideration of such opinion stating impossibility and the like - a sociological bomb so to speak - having only the apparent designs of failure ultimately? ~

This of course is further considerable in that no person is supposedly of infallible/Godly perfection - which then reasons that failure is inevitable - and potentially destructive when then excluding the previously presented aspects for atonement. ~

To consider the extremes presented in the Lord stating the Israelites to be not good and a stubborn people - then to issue such decree as total compliance or nothing (maybe worse) is to see an example of the differing extremes I have noted within the observable motion between them. ~

It also substantiates perspectives from the consideration that the design itself seems destined to failure. At least prone to even amplify the effect of human tendencies in/of perceived - categorized that is to say - failures. ~

While it is that I personally believe as previously stated - that it is a cash and carry approach which found most success in relation to efforts to comply (compared to that in want of reward for instance) - it can be seen in such lines of thought, where the introduction of Christ may have been seen as necessary by some. ~

But, I am inclined to say only by some given the obvious point of divergence in the continuance with said introduction and the maintenance of the previous belief structure - however removed from the previous normal atmosphere. ~

Especially in further considering the developments around and post Christ (modern forms of Christianity). Many with a major focal point at the very area where Christ was introduced. ~

Perhaps such focus even indicates the failings of the particular interpretations previously which then diverged in that direction of continuance/development? This in noticing the aspect of such distinction being perhaps indicative of earlier tendencies by some to address sections within such efforts to comply - as opposed to the work applied as an entirety. ~

Of course the conquering aspect(s) lend influence as well - but again, even the development of the more modern versions through that conquered aspect - speaks volumes to the consistent application of it. ~

Most definitely something to continue to consider as the work continues in study. ~

Especially in considering the apparent development sequence of such character use/application as is the idea of Christ. ~

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY: 12/22/2006 (Standards Set For Failure? More Comparison And Consideration Of The Idea Of Christ As Result Of A Developed Chain Of

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/22/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

By

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/22/2006

29:23 of Deuteronomy then depicts a rather ominous chain of events which could be seen from modern perspectives as having told the future to some extent - which then gives a person reason to consider several things really. More especially in again considering the intention of such strenuous guidelines as prospectively setting up the failure of the people? ~

Further perhaps, beyond being an instruction book - actually filling the purpose of a battle ground of sorts between the extremes presented within it. ~

Not even so much as utilizing the apparent motion in that movement I have noted within it - but only having been a manifest of those extremes in/from some perspectives - which then lead to the extreme measure within its continuation with and through the introduction of Christ?

02/15/2007 As a note to maintain a sense of consistency here, these thoughts regarding the introduction of Christ are very much from the perspective of consideration of the work from the current perspective in thought in study within the book of Deuteronomy. It is still some time within that linear consideration of this work, before the figure of Christ is to be introduced.

From a more distant consideration in an abstract sense - considering the results having transpired, even with the rather diligent maintenance of many rituals within it from the most ancient times - it could be reasoned as perhaps even been a ploy to render such results?

I realize that is an extreme consideration - and within it is an assumption of god having some sort of political agenda beyond that being topically discerned within the pages of the bible. ~

I am more inclined, within that abstract consideration - to see such potential as having been as result of the obvious extremes within that multiple potential. Perhaps in considering the proposed motion, even the work itself having been rendered as a result of a larger struggle - the stream of it being rendered in our perception as it has been presented thus far. ~

Further, something of the sort is supported in stating that the curses and blessings will transpire - this being stated without regard to atonement and other effort to comply. Matter of factly - as if such were un-avoidable. ~

29:23 definitely stands as another point of contact sort of example - though such is a unique example thus far in the context of it being of destruction - Sodom and Gomorrah being cited in comparison to the impending results of the curses at the time. ~

29:28 bears striking resemblance to two notable movements of people I can immediately recall - one of them being the shipment of prisoners from Europe to Australia - and the other of course (as I am exploring currently) being a rather involved and ongoing version known as the United States of America, in the form of populating the country with refugees from others. ~

In another sense when considering the consistencies presented thus far - and further, the progressive aspect of such consistencies - it then presents the potential that within these descriptions of curses to transpire - is the culmination of that progressive consistency eventually onto the Israelites themselves, as a matter of the consistencies, themselves. ~

As previously explored in connection with Jacob/Israel/Aaron/Moses/Jesus - there is a growing progression in the scapegoat sense.

More so, in the place where sins are contained and then remedied presumably. ~

Perhaps it is in that progression eventually culminating, that such curses will happen to all of the tribes of Israelites? ~

The Israelites then, from our perspective in modern society according to these passages - will eventually serve the same purpose as Christ within that progression. Then, as is described in chapter 30 to some degree - again being resurrected so to speak. ~

At this point in the work then, it seems silly to attempt any sort of total compliance given the tone of it being so matter of fact - and further then is its own examples of paradox.

In commitment to such writ, is then the commitment to such as said curses transpiring as well. Especially within the commitment level in attempts at compliance. ~

This paradox then lends different light to the idea of Christ as well - especially in considering the commitment level aspect as well as the perception in approach and application.

To believe and attempt compliance (total, unquestionable compliance), is to believe and bring the result of curses.

02/15/2007 To further note thought as I transpose this entry, such then as with much of the work considered in a larger sense, seems very much to be of human tendency. as a person may watch a child playing.. perhaps doing things they know from previous instruction not to do, then attempting to conceal it in the effort to comply - such then could be reasoned as the common approach of most people - which of course then presents the need to accommodate - an area so to speak, where in such mysterious occurrences (as everyone is obviously in compliance, right?) can be addressed - thus rendering the larger duality in the social sense as is demonstrated in separating the Israelites between the Mountains pertaining to curse and blessings. Through said transference, it could be said that the average, everyday transgressions are minimized to some degree.

This then, in Christs acts of/in rebellion even to the scriptures - is of said scriptures!

Beyond what may be the attempts to break those curses and beyond even establishing a doorway through them. ~

Considering the dynamic of this within the social progression and developments - it then presents areas where envious attitudes would manifest in seeing the successes of others (as is human tendency). Especially considering the facet presented of too much effort (want as it were) to get the prizes seemingly promised for compliance - actually brought about the curses in as much haste as was applied in attempts to win the prizes - further and more quickly then I assume, with ulterior motive(s) present.

02/15/2007 As noted within these thoughts in several places, it can be seen here that this seems to be an ideology to facilitate everyday existence - at least in having such potential within/of it - but of course, as per those human tendencies, the various forms of abuses have manifested and remained a part of it... though, I would even argue that such tendencies are very much considered as can be seen within the depiction of Saul among others.

In some respects within the developments since Christ, such a tendency in progression and of course in considering the aspect of furtherance through being conquered - it lends the Romans the role of fall guy beyond even, having crucified Christ. ~

It further presents a rather simplistic though seemingly effective hell of sorts - this through the immediate confusion a person might have in finding as many curse as rewards for over diligent effort in compliance - seeing as the work itself is both blessings and curses. Especially for those complying to such extremes only in the effort of procuring a reward - further, in the effort of being seen as better suited for reward than those not involved in such ploys and consequently within a more common means of compliance - avoiding the manifestation of curses within such common approach (lack of ploy for instance) - though still benefiting from simple productivity. ~

The confusion seems it would then serve as further inspiration as desperation in perhaps then fueling even gross transgressions as result of said confusion and re-doubled efforts in avoiding what they themselves feel, should befall them. ~

Come to think of it, in that sense and potential dynamic - such could then render the fall guy - spoiler - element, as a perceived God like position in making such motions as stealing from the (potentially) righteous living in simple compliance - to award to those posturing of deservedness within said ploys - popularity even - and of course, supposed compliance. ~

Though I can see this as a common use of such dynamic - even in the popular perceived meaning of Christ in such a capacity - my personal opinion is that such use and tactic ruins the otherwise prosperous potential(s) of acknowledging the facet that effort (in such designs) in such compliance - especially for ulterior reasons - brings as much hardship and loses the value of the simple compliance in the course of existence. ~

It seems then very much to have become a standard approach in many ways... to the degree even of priority being a concern of how to avoid the mishaps, while being entirely ignorant of the other potential benefits in the more common application sans such ploys. ~

Such a dynamic then seems to magnify the initial power struggles becoming evident with the recently described divisions and divergences. ~

Coupled with the spoiler aspect, then seems to render a potential motion of those being able to pay/compensate said spoiler - then proceeding to victimize those having found more successful paths through common compliance - minding ones own business for instance, and being simply productive - cash and carry sort of designs.

Of course such efforts to procure utilize the appearance of a greater compliance in such influences - even in the fact that such greater compliance to such extremes as to be flaunted and reasoned as deserving being evidence of/to themselves as being to the contrary.

But, I suppose that few would recognize that in modern popular perception - Maybe such is from where the adage rich get richer first began? ~

It definitely presents different approaches to the idea of Christ. ~

The immediate result in design rendering such a scapegoat - even from the spoiler element. ~

The longevity result in such a design rendering such as concept within which better results can arise from said simple application of simple compliance through existence. ~

It seems then a division of immediate perceived results and the potential in experiencing existence. ~

Given the tendencies of people in general - it seems the designs in use for longevity would need be in a rather large sense. Perhaps something large enough to accommodate the more desperate tendencies within even itself - though unknown to any (given those tendencies). ~

Thus far then, that even through the hideous descriptions of curses and plundering - the most efficient course within it, is simple existence with attentions to ones interests - performing ones profession with earnest for example (as per honest measure) - and of course without too much ambition in attempting to look as more in compliance - especially given as is stated that all of these blessings and curses were to transpire.

Such being further substantiated in 29:19.

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY: 12/21/2006 (Did They Drink So Much, They Forgot They Drank Anything At All?)

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/21/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

Did They Drink So Much, They Forgot They Drank Anything At All?

An Observation

By

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/21/2006

Again in Chapter 29 of Deuteronomy, is yet another repetition with yet another peculiar augmentation concerning alcohol. For some reason at this point it is said that no alcohol was consumed since leaving Egypt.

It further describes the Israelites as without faculties such as understanding or similar sight and hearing in same suggested ways. ~

Chapter 29 then makes other differentiations, including an air of the covenant just being established - suggesting that all previous was not of the covenant - even stating that the present act of entering into the covenant will establish the Israelites as his people. ~

This even after again having likened those present with those having left Egypt - then further stating that their future generations will be of the terms as well.

Those who are not standing here today. ~

29:18 then again presents a tone as if Moses were God; I am making this covenant with you.... ~

29:20 then reveals an aspect of the bible which few consider, even beyond the stated instruction aspect - being that it is a book of curses as well as blessings in the literal sense, stating curses to be written in it quite blatantly in that verse. ~

Such again very much points to a multiple aspect in a single focus, even though human tendency itself is frequently to extremes.

This presents a God having ability toward severe brutality and kindness. Something which modern society does not even accept of individuals. Especially in an open manner - thus forcing many into social inversions due to peer pressure.

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY: 12/20/2006 (continued) - (The Devil Can Do That, Too! Devour your Children!)

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/20/2006

(continued)

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

The Devil Can Do That, Too! Devour your Children!

And of course, the imposed suggestive suggestions, suggesting suggestive interactions!

An Observation

By

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/20/2006 (continued)

28:20 of Deuteronomy further presents curses for disobedience. It gives reason to consider the potential dangers in such curses - unless of course a person is aware of their own level in compliance - given the relationship (and known rivalry) between the Lord and Lucifer. Especially considering what is widely known as a popular tactic fro the Devil in considering such a proposed duality and dichotomy - being mimicry.

How easy would it be with such discord, for the Devil to level similar results resembling the effect in result of such curses?

Even utilizing the same reasoning in destroying any with designs of abandoning the mimicry as if to be the Lord punishing wayward action? ~

Again and especially at this point in time regarding this ideology - such efforts of/in entirely separating the idea of good and evil in our world presents only potential destruction(s) untold. ~

Such consideration and reasoning bolsters my perspective and opinion regarding the efficiency of such ideology(ies) in our modern day - most especially beyond the idea of Christ and further given the depth at which humanity already employs daily, that which was/would have been considered extreme abomination in that time period. ~

I still contend that the work itself is best understood as an entire consideration - given that such would be the desired result in considering it at all. though it is that within it are the particulars still in motion which obviously comprise it. ~

Yet again perhaps example of paradox/dichotomy - and further human growth and development of capacity and understanding. ~

28:25 continues with curses for extreme disobedience, but now turns the potential scattering in seven directions into a possibility for the Israelites under the wrath of their enemies - sending even defeat of the Israelites for failure to comply. ~

Of course, as history shows, the Israelites were conquered - but as well in the same history can be seen the use of those conquering societies to actually further the belief structure itself - even providing for several mutations between it and existing hosts having conquered them, which very much is an attribute in my opinion of the soundness of at least the consistencies having been established as per a motion of social development. ~

Such a shift in social normality from overt conquerors to conquered residence seems only to have provided further potential for the more socially geared aspects of the previously proposed consistencies and conquering.

The infiltration aspects so to speak, whether or not such was intended at the time. The consistency of/between existing social influences - as a matter of course has even given rise to mighty nations of themselves, with no direct affiliation to those initial consistencies. ~

It is within these passages containing curses for failure to comply, that more insight is brought to the introduction of Christ and more so in the time period that such transpired - after having been conquered to a greater or lesser degree. ~

It also gives more consideration to the idea of an employed mimicry transpiring (at least potentially) in the conquering nations doing themselves, things described as to transpire in the event(s) of such non-compliance as would mandate curses. ~

Such a social area considering the attempts of other nations to posture as bringers of supposed punishment - occurs to me as a potential birthplace of Ecclesiastics - Church Politics so to speak being employed within the and as the potential postured punishment, there then arises the potential of postured compliance in reaction while further facilitating more political subject matter in regard to both tendencies. ~

A person really has to wonder at the common (and seemingly implied) interpretation and understanding of this work as to be a literal mandate through and through given the severity for failure of such a collection of rules and standards in that literal sense. ~

A person could reason from such angles that perhaps - in that literal and rigid direction - that it was decidedly failed in that sense before it even continued on. Especially at this point of the work, itself. ~

To realize within this apparent example of extreme in regard to the observable motion within it and to consider something such as 28:15, to somehow supersede and outweigh the previous and larger design for remitting atonement - then it is that this body of people were most definitely cursed. ~

But - in regarding the work in motion of it, as an entirety, not only are the extremes of a potential duality and multiple aspect revealed more obviously within the current passages - but the wisdom in considering the work in an entirety becomes more obvious as well. ~

How could it be reasoned that the God presenting ceremony and consistency - avenues for atonement of/for transgressions - be the same comprised elemental body which now pronounces some rather extreme curses if they do not obey all of the commands and decrees? ~

This extreme displays the pronounced possibility within the multiple/single aspect I have described. ~

Further in considering these passages filled with some rather inhuman descriptions as curses - then provides, as stated, an amount of probability in/for the eventual introduction of Christ - further, with that introduction of Christ as result and in effort presumably to stave the continuance of such curses, it then suggests from my present perspective in the modern day - that perhaps the existing writ/decree of the time was not itself recognized as of distinct extremes of influence - then further, does not seem to have been regarded as a work in entirety. Though, such contradicts the previous presented social dynamic and potentials in such a consideration as the work not being recognized as an entirety. ~

At the risk of being seen as a heretic, this inconsistency then points most definitely to the imposed aspects of such curses from other - perhaps conquering - civilizations from the perspective which chose to ignore the larger work as entirety. ~

In that then, perhaps forcing the very necessitation of the idea of Christ within those more political turmoils - to counter the oppressive and imposed aspects of confined and literal interpretation(s) of such curses. ~

Perhaps having been conquered somehow then presented a perceived understanding that such curses were in effect, while progressively removing the options for atonement with the oppression? ~

02/14/2007 As further note within this consideration, it is entirely possible that such confined perspective as result of being conquered and oppressed, the facilitated further the larger progress - even more so, facilitated the confined and contained perspective of those conquering enemies pertaining to the larger body of the work itself. Somehow failing to see the larger motion of it as it transpired within and of that larger, ongoing consideration - much within the act of oppression itself.

But of course, as mentioned, such was only a given aspect of the resulting transition in being conquered. Other facets obviously continued in the furtherance of said consistencies. ~

Even being similar to some areas within said curses - then leading a person to wonder if such design in curse was not actually a blessing in disguise, so to speak - through facilitating the further and more diverse establishment of the existing consistencies. ~

28:36 and 28:64 demonstrate this in then considering a consistency fo being exiled over and again - while maintaining levels of the previous consistency(ies) ~

Again, in considering the possibility that the means for atonement were removed - it then very much is that the figure of Christ is necessitated and very much is substantiated in/from such reasoning's when considering the idea presented in symbolic transference of flesh and blood. ~

If God was the Israelites King, and Christ was presented as the son of God, then it is (as previously explored), that Christ was then symbolically the son of all Israelites - even the Israelites themselves. ~

This can then be seen as relation to the curses such as devouring ones own children as sustenance - through then attaching it symbolically to the action of consuming unleavened bread and wine - which further then, related to pass over. ~

Within the relation with pass over, is another turn in development symbolically in the reference to Christ being the lamb of God and the wine representing his blood - such then would direct a transference to the houses having been marked for pass over with lambs blood, perhaps to encompass all of the Israelites in that point of contact. ~

Such is, among other things - a definite area of yet another divergence. This being obvious in the continuance of the Hebrew faith and of course the manifestation of Christianity in various forms - though it is a notable interest that among many of the obvious actions Christ was said to have done - and further those actions having been remarkable similarities in a contrary sense to many of the curse in the passages - within that obvious divergence, some of those curses continued in progression and development both relating to the motion of Christianity and the motion of the previous consistencies - separately to some degree it seems. ~

Considering the level of transference and symbology thus far within the work - now even noted as Book of instruction - it becomes more and more obvious that even the necessitation of Christ to serve as such a tool for transference, was very much inevitable and further, politically motivated.

Within the already existing forms of transference seems to have been adequate means to accommodate the extremes of such curses as eating ones own children and the sort. ~

The present comparison with Christ then further presents a larger, self consuming cycle within the applied context of lamb and un-leavened bread, as well - which even heightens the divergence at the introduction of such. ~

In some perspectives, it could even be reasoned that the results of such introduction, was more a continuance than the creation of other faiths. this in considering the initial (though only partial intent) action in association with the Israelites and pass over with the actions of Christ - but setting into motion within that divergence - a self consuming cycle in progression - however symbolically (within those lines of consideration). ~

The biggest difference I suppose is then a matter of perceived distance given the present curse to consume ones own children greedily even, where that which can be discerned within the resulting symbolism of related areas in the actions of Christ - places a distance to the initial pass over, through transference at given points of contact. ~

28:68 is something I have as of yet to hear of transpiring in the curse of the Israelites being sent back to Egypt, offering themselves as slaves only to be refused. ~

02/14/2007 To note on this in current study - it is recently within the book of 1 Kings, that Solomon - the son of David, takes Pharaohs daughter as his first wife.... then, as it is described as having transpired, Solomons son loses the majority of the kingdom to an individual having fled from Solomon to Egypt - only to return with Solomons death. Symbolically, such could be of relation to some degree.

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY: 12/20/2006 (The Scent Of Blood In The Wild? Heads And Tails? Does Across The Street Change?)

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/20/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

The Scent Of Blood In The Wild? Heads And Tails? Does Across The Street Change?

An Observation

By

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/20/2006

It is rather notable to have stated that enemies will scatter in seven directions - the common ritual regarding sacrifice at the time was in sprinkling blood upon the altar 7 times. Perhaps a relation within that as well even further than the idea suggested of blood. ~

Though it is a bit of speculation, considering the described idea that burnt offerings are a pleasing aroma to the Lord - this would then suggest a level of relation in an olfactory sense which could then easily be applied to the relation of blood sprinkled seven times, and the symbolic association of enemies then being spattered with it, in that sense. Such as chum for a shark so to speak. ~

Given that cooking flesh was acknowledged and further that blood is even said to have been reserved for the Lord in some instances - it seems that the symbolism within that is akin to smearing honey on someone near grizzlies. As well, the bread of suffering is consumed for 7 days during pass over. ~

This affiliation with enemies and 7, then seems to create another symbolic relation as well - in affiliating them with a proximity (though symbolically) with the altar and even the ark of the covenant - again, given that the blood is sprinkled seven times. ~

This line of thought then suggests a slightly different capacity (perhaps) of the altar and ark itself. Presumably through this line of reasoning, employing it in a curse like manner as in symbolically entrapping the enemy within those commandments and somewhat between the Lord and the proposed agreement with/for the Israelites. Symbolically exposing them (the enemy) to their own faults in regard to the presented Israelite belief structure. Knowing them to obviously not be in compliance. ~

If it were thought that the ark and altar held the focus of a larger influence in the contained manner previously explored - in or near which only safe existence could transpire through the established consistencies and conditioned atmosphere - then, within that belief structure, it is no far leap to realize that such exposure outside of those consistencies would be thought to have adverse effects on those not sufficiently within the confines of the established consistency/conditioned atmosphere. ~

Again, providing it were thought that such ritual and belief structure honed and contained at least a portion of a larger influence. Perhaps similar as could be a constructed wind break within a perpetual wind storm? As said contained influence may have been similar to in regard to comparison as per understanding. The wind break being representative in this example, of the existing consistencies relating to this explorative example. ~

28:13 of Deuteronomy puts forward another metaphor that is intriguing in regard to prospective reward for compliance with the commands having been issued by the Lord. Such compliance is said to always make you the head, not the tail and always the top, not the bottom. ~

Beyond this obviously being metaphor suggesting a series of one being preferable to the other - a person is drawn to consider what it may reference; Head and Tail of? Top and bottom of? ~

This then presents a duality in presence yet again and rather in a firm manner in this instance providing that the Lord perceives a Top and Bottom and a Head and Tail. ~

Given the statement of tail and further the consistency of anything (most anything) having a tail at this point has become a sacrifice in one form or another - it kind of takes away from the initial allure presented within such a statement. ~

Perhaps then further, given the previous issued decree that the Israelites were not good and a stubborn people, the Lord might actually not be expecting entire and total compliance to have been possible - which, in a broader consideration of applied social, then would relegate the Israelites to somewhere in the middle on average - given human tendency.

Neither head nor tail nor top nor bottom in that greater perspective. ~

This of course not being in comparison to other civilizations/cultures - but only in consideration of human tendency and the suggested possibilities within this belief structure itself. ~

This then further substantiated in considering the result in that sense, of the opposing presented extremes of curse in perceived disobedience and blessing in compliance.

Then yet further in considering the presented ability and means through which to atone for transgressions with the act and action(s) of celebration. Provided it was done in a somewhat conducive manner regarding desired result in effect of blessing and curse punishment. ~

Personally, in regard to top and bottom as suggested in the more grand sense within the time period issued - from my perspective in the modern day in considering even the result of such introduced structures and the subsequent mutations over time - it doesn't seem that their is a possible top in that sense - nor perhaps even a discernable and likewise constant bottom - though within the continued motion of such social designs - there are somewhat extreme examples of both. ~

This, as such social structure(s) continue in progress with, within and even of other similar social designs in motion. ~

(Other Notes Pertaining To The Motion Of Concept Into Realization Through The Process Of 'Progress')

In another angle of perspective regarding the possible context of such statements as top and bottom - wouldn't it be reasonable then that the top is a comparison even with the idea of God in that sense, being presumably the most high? ~

Then what of considerations in perspective(s) concerning possible motion between our plane of existence and that of the Lord within this ideology? ~

It would stand to reason given the examples of pronounced extremes, that such a motion exists - which in effect then would seem to result in an unrecognized shift in perspective.

For example, within the consideration of a possible difference in that motion; the top being on the side at times, and even at a position once having been regarded as bottom though not acknowledged as such within and through the insulated area of difference. ~

Meaning perhaps that the Lords perspective (similar to our likeness being similar as described) sees things only in and from said perspective as do we, from our own perception of our own surroundings without regard for what may transpire in regard to a position respect in such a relationship - between the different perspectives. ~

Our the top and the bottom always being seen from our perspective as our the top and the bottom - and likewise the Lords perspective; The top and The bottom always remaining consistent from that perspective - but the relation between the separate sets of the top and the bottom actually having a non-fixed relationship. At times even only juxtaposed instead of a direct opposite consideration.