STUDIES IN THEOLOGY - POPULAR CHRISTIANITY: Deuteronomy 6 Thru 1 Samuel 23

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY - 12/26/2006 (Moses Finally Kicks Off! Again A Reference To Extremes In Right or Left)

2007-03-15T12:05:00.000-07:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/26/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/26/2006

Chapter 34 of Deuteronomy describes Moses as finally dieing at the age of 120! Though I seem to recall other ages noted in past versions of the bible I have seen. Some ever quite old in modern standards. ~

34:06 states that the Lord buried him in a secret place. ~

It again mentions that Joshua will become a similar focal point - but then restates that Moses even knew the Lord face to face. And of course was a prophet, no less - claiming him unique in comparison even to the prophets being disciples of Jesus presumably - stating that there has never been another prophet like Moses. Wonders in the land of Egypt and Mighty powers in the sight of Israel! Of course this is long before the disciples of Jesus... but still a formidable statement none the less. ~

The book of Joshua begins with the description of Joshua taking charge as it were - but I find something else interesting in 1:03 of Joshua, which sounds rather similar to the basic idea of modern embassies, though somewhat out of context. ~

Especially in the development of the tribes of Israel disbursing long years later, in a similar context as previously exploring consistencies socially within such developments - it definitely seems a potential relation - especially given the saturation of the work known as the bible in popular Christianity as well as societies in general. ~

1:07 then perhaps lends some insight into the reasoning of extreme efforts to comply dually with the ill result of the curses; As instruction from the Lord, Joshua is told as well to obey the instructions and further it is emphasized do not deviate from them, turning either to the right or to the left. Further that such will render success in everything a person does. ~

I see this as meaning a few things - the first of which definitely corroborating a decided lack of effort to comply in extremes (especially for the prizes), then further that such an approach will fulfill the failures in smaller doses as well - being then carried along with/by both the atonement and the moderate success found in common existence with such instruction in mind. ~

This also means that those failures will be fulfilled so to speak - but also will then be seen as success in everything.... given that such failures are instructed as well within the same writ which commands compliance with the instructions. ~

Humble, productive living seems very much the underlying instruction here. ~

Neither an extreme effort to comply, nor an extreme effort to fail. ~

Turning to the right...left being applicable in that sense, I would think. ~

It even stresses to obey all of the instruction - which of course then includes the failures for which to atone in celebration (as has been described).

This aspect seems quite strange when looking at modern society and the tendency toward political extremes of one or the other. Tending to place those of such common success, between two extremes - both claiming compliance with something in one form or another. ~

The strange part of this from my perspective is in regarding the level of saturation and influence from popular Christianity - if only as result of the years of development. ~

It does present another similarity I would imagine, upon closer consideration in comparison - given that patterned motion I have noted in the non-linear sense - and further with the depicted changes to the tribes of Israel throughout this work. ~

That, being the noted potentials in political changes and further the developed diversities progressing through a process of divergence. ~

This of course being heightened and then re-focused with the introduction of previous consistencies, then in a future consideration from this point in the work - the introduction of even Christ and the disciples. ~

Then even more so in considering that social motion as per said influences - with the introduction of the idea of Christ itself then tending to one extreme or the other as per said divergence between old testament and those continuations with/within the seemingly greater influence of the new testament. ~

Which again, beyond the existing potentials politically between the tribes - then introduces an expansion of - onto, an existing body (being the Israelites in this instance). ~

In a broad sense, and regarding the initial tendency of the multiple/single point of focus - such, as would be the introduction of Christ, then seems as though it is another attempt to re-establish such a single point of focus. ~

Such is consistent with the existing pattern of that progressive development; Jacob(Israel), Moses/Aaron... Christ... (at this point with of course King David and some others within that developing motion) - the Christ aspect happening more within the motion of/with the developments pertaining to conquering nation(s) - even utilizing them in ways explored previously. Further though, within that instance and symbolism of Christ (as well as actions) - it seems in considering it - and in regard to that use of single point of focus - that such had perhaps polarized in the directions designed - within the tribes so to speak, as previously explored.

Then, with the symbolic representation of the tribes (being disciples), such was again set into another motion. Albeit a motion as can be discerned with/within the larger divergence, and not altogether being accepted within the larger body (as standard). ~

It will be interesting to study someday, the greater influences of the time - but it seems that the extremes in modern society are of such divergence - if only in said larger influence. ~

As a thought, the symbolism of the idea(s) of Christ - seems to present further a need to no longer attempt to adhere to the instructions previously presented, especially in the extremes - which suggests that perhaps the failures did arise to a degree that warranted some effort to atone for them? Perhaps in the conquered aspect, as well? (further studies)

The physical symbolism I can see of the crucifixion, briefly considering it - suggests a torturous bonding at the extremes - especially of right and left - which of course must not be of the previous instruction, as previously noted. ~

Within this comparison, such then suggests the extremes of right and wrong - which again, in understanding the previous instructions - do not exist in that sense. That is to suggest in such understanding, that to have failed in having any human failings, so to speak - is to have failed in the eyes of those instructions - meaning there could be no extreme of correct achieved, unless it was then relegated to/within the idea of incorrect in having done so through not adhering to the instructions. ~

Such I see as where the ill effect of/as result of the previously explored idea in extreme effort to comply, would arise. Such extreme efforts really then only becoming incorrect within themselves. ~

While it seems obvious that such a brutal form of execution/torture (crucifixion) was not of the Israelites (though having been brutal themselves), the symbolism presents other facets to consider within the existing motion (socially) of the time. ~

Physically, the symbolism suggests the extremes of right and left - as well as other extremes - suspending the body in a more centrist position, which of course in examining the previous instructions - through the tendencies of human nature, will have been most of the more successful/productive of the Israelites. (considering this at this point in the work itself).

This then physiologically - even sub-consciously tends to promote a leaning to either extreme in an effort to be the nails within the symbolism, as opposed to the body. ~

Again, such is in reference to the physical presence that thousands of crucified people would have seemed to represent in some level of perception. Again, aside from the potentials in/of transference as previously explored - and from a slightly different perspective comparatively with the previously explored rules within the work that such became an extension of. ~

Of course it is that I am speaking of quite a ways from the present area of reference within this work concerning popular Christianity. And even between this area and the introduction of Christ are other examples within the progression of developments. King David being one of them - and a rather good example as per productivity, if I recall correctly. Very much the embodiment of barometer previously explored, and as well very similar to that having been depicted as per king and the similarities such contains with modern political offices. ~

When considering these different perspectives in a non-linear sense as many of them echo through modern society - it presents an interesting visage to say the least. ~

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY; 12/23/2006 (Too Much Effort To Comply? More Observation Of Christ)

2007-03-08T06:36:00.001-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/23/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

Too Much Effort To Comply? More Observation Of Christ

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/23/2006

30:11 of Deuteronomy almost seems to warn even of too much effort to comply.

The tone of it almost seems like a hint in that direction.

Then 30:12 seems to again foreshadow Christ in some ways, almost contrary to the previous - seeming - reassurance of ease to some degree. ~

This perspective of course is from our modern day, long after the introduction of Christ - but in that almost tells then of a given level of failure of the tribes of Israel in that very introduction as it might relate to this verse in particular. ~

Did the majority of the Israelites fail to see the ease in which and with which such reassurance alludes to? ~

Was it only apparent failure with the conquering Romans filling the role of prophecy culmination - then forcing the application of Christ? ~

Further then, in regard to these aspects of again reasserting attention to commands and decrees which some would argue are/were unreasonable/impossible to fulfill - that perhaps, as briefly stated, the work itself could hold the potentials of a sort of psychological warfare - being, within consideration of such opinion stating impossibility and the like - a sociological bomb so to speak - having only the apparent designs of failure ultimately? ~

This of course is further considerable in that no person is supposedly of infallible/Godly perfection - which then reasons that failure is inevitable - and potentially destructive when then excluding the previously presented aspects for atonement. ~

To consider the extremes presented in the Lord stating the Israelites to be not good and a stubborn people - then to issue such decree as total compliance or nothing (maybe worse) is to see an example of the differing extremes I have noted within the observable motion between them. ~

It also substantiates perspectives from the consideration that the design itself seems destined to failure. At least prone to even amplify the effect of human tendencies in/of perceived - categorized that is to say - failures. ~

While it is that I personally believe as previously stated - that it is a cash and carry approach which found most success in relation to efforts to comply (compared to that in want of reward for instance) - it can be seen in such lines of thought, where the introduction of Christ may have been seen as necessary by some. ~

But, I am inclined to say only by some given the obvious point of divergence in the continuance with said introduction and the maintenance of the previous belief structure - however removed from the previous normal atmosphere. ~

Especially in further considering the developments around and post Christ (modern forms of Christianity). Many with a major focal point at the very area where Christ was introduced. ~

Perhaps such focus even indicates the failings of the particular interpretations previously which then diverged in that direction of continuance/development? This in noticing the aspect of such distinction being perhaps indicative of earlier tendencies by some to address sections within such efforts to comply - as opposed to the work applied as an entirety. ~

Of course the conquering aspect(s) lend influence as well - but again, even the development of the more modern versions through that conquered aspect - speaks volumes to the consistent application of it. ~

Most definitely something to continue to consider as the work continues in study. ~

Especially in considering the apparent development sequence of such character use/application as is the idea of Christ. ~

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY: 12/22/2006 (Standards Set For Failure? More Comparison And Consideration Of The Idea Of Christ As Result Of A Developed Chain Of

2007-02-28T11:53:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/22/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/22/2006

29:23 of Deuteronomy then depicts a rather ominous chain of events which could be seen from modern perspectives as having told the future to some extent - which then gives a person reason to consider several things really. More especially in again considering the intention of such strenuous guidelines as prospectively setting up the failure of the people? ~

Further perhaps, beyond being an instruction book - actually filling the purpose of a battle ground of sorts between the extremes presented within it. ~

Not even so much as utilizing the apparent motion in that movement I have noted within it - but only having been a manifest of those extremes in/from some perspectives - which then lead to the extreme measure within its continuation with and through the introduction of Christ?

02/15/2007 As a note to maintain a sense of consistency here, these thoughts regarding the introduction of Christ are very much from the perspective of consideration of the work from the current perspective in thought in study within the book of Deuteronomy. It is still some time within that linear consideration of this work, before the figure of Christ is to be introduced.

From a more distant consideration in an abstract sense - considering the results having transpired, even with the rather diligent maintenance of many rituals within it from the most ancient times - it could be reasoned as perhaps even been a ploy to render such results?

I realize that is an extreme consideration - and within it is an assumption of god having some sort of political agenda beyond that being topically discerned within the pages of the bible. ~

I am more inclined, within that abstract consideration - to see such potential as having been as result of the obvious extremes within that multiple potential. Perhaps in considering the proposed motion, even the work itself having been rendered as a result of a larger struggle - the stream of it being rendered in our perception as it has been presented thus far. ~

Further, something of the sort is supported in stating that the curses and blessings will transpire - this being stated without regard to atonement and other effort to comply. Matter of factly - as if such were un-avoidable. ~

29:23 definitely stands as another point of contact sort of example - though such is a unique example thus far in the context of it being of destruction - Sodom and Gomorrah being cited in comparison to the impending results of the curses at the time. ~

29:28 bears striking resemblance to two notable movements of people I can immediately recall - one of them being the shipment of prisoners from Europe to Australia - and the other of course (as I am exploring currently) being a rather involved and ongoing version known as the United States of America, in the form of populating the country with refugees from others. ~

In another sense when considering the consistencies presented thus far - and further, the progressive aspect of such consistencies - it then presents the potential that within these descriptions of curses to transpire - is the culmination of that progressive consistency eventually onto the Israelites themselves, as a matter of the consistencies, themselves. ~

As previously explored in connection with Jacob/Israel/Aaron/Moses/Jesus - there is a growing progression in the scapegoat sense.

More so, in the place where sins are contained and then remedied presumably. ~

Perhaps it is in that progression eventually culminating, that such curses will happen to all of the tribes of Israelites? ~

The Israelites then, from our perspective in modern society according to these passages - will eventually serve the same purpose as Christ within that progression. Then, as is described in chapter 30 to some degree - again being resurrected so to speak. ~

At this point in the work then, it seems silly to attempt any sort of total compliance given the tone of it being so matter of fact - and further then is its own examples of paradox.

In commitment to such writ, is then the commitment to such as said curses transpiring as well. Especially within the commitment level in attempts at compliance. ~

This paradox then lends different light to the idea of Christ as well - especially in considering the commitment level aspect as well as the perception in approach and application.

To believe and attempt compliance (total, unquestionable compliance), is to believe and bring the result of curses.

02/15/2007 To further note thought as I transpose this entry, such then as with much of the work considered in a larger sense, seems very much to be of human tendency. as a person may watch a child playing.. perhaps doing things they know from previous instruction not to do, then attempting to conceal it in the effort to comply - such then could be reasoned as the common approach of most people - which of course then presents the need to accommodate - an area so to speak, where in such mysterious occurrences (as everyone is obviously in compliance, right?) can be addressed - thus rendering the larger duality in the social sense as is demonstrated in separating the Israelites between the Mountains pertaining to curse and blessings. Through said transference, it could be said that the average, everyday transgressions are minimized to some degree.

This then, in Christs acts of/in rebellion even to the scriptures - is of said scriptures!

Beyond what may be the attempts to break those curses and beyond even establishing a doorway through them. ~

Considering the dynamic of this within the social progression and developments - it then presents areas where envious attitudes would manifest in seeing the successes of others (as is human tendency). Especially considering the facet presented of too much effort (want as it were) to get the prizes seemingly promised for compliance - actually brought about the curses in as much haste as was applied in attempts to win the prizes - further and more quickly then I assume, with ulterior motive(s) present.

02/15/2007 As noted within these thoughts in several places, it can be seen here that this seems to be an ideology to facilitate everyday existence - at least in having such potential within/of it - but of course, as per those human tendencies, the various forms of abuses have manifested and remained a part of it... though, I would even argue that such tendencies are very much considered as can be seen within the depiction of Saul among others.

In some respects within the developments since Christ, such a tendency in progression and of course in considering the aspect of furtherance through being conquered - it lends the Romans the role of fall guy beyond even, having crucified Christ. ~

It further presents a rather simplistic though seemingly effective hell of sorts - this through the immediate confusion a person might have in finding as many curse as rewards for over diligent effort in compliance - seeing as the work itself is both blessings and curses. Especially for those complying to such extremes only in the effort of procuring a reward - further, in the effort of being seen as better suited for reward than those not involved in such ploys and consequently within a more common means of compliance - avoiding the manifestation of curses within such common approach (lack of ploy for instance) - though still benefiting from simple productivity. ~

The confusion seems it would then serve as further inspiration as desperation in perhaps then fueling even gross transgressions as result of said confusion and re-doubled efforts in avoiding what they themselves feel, should befall them. ~

Come to think of it, in that sense and potential dynamic - such could then render the fall guy - spoiler - element, as a perceived God like position in making such motions as stealing from the (potentially) righteous living in simple compliance - to award to those posturing of deservedness within said ploys - popularity even - and of course, supposed compliance. ~

Though I can see this as a common use of such dynamic - even in the popular perceived meaning of Christ in such a capacity - my personal opinion is that such use and tactic ruins the otherwise prosperous potential(s) of acknowledging the facet that effort (in such designs) in such compliance - especially for ulterior reasons - brings as much hardship and loses the value of the simple compliance in the course of existence. ~

It seems then very much to have become a standard approach in many ways... to the degree even of priority being a concern of how to avoid the mishaps, while being entirely ignorant of the other potential benefits in the more common application sans such ploys. ~

Such a dynamic then seems to magnify the initial power struggles becoming evident with the recently described divisions and divergences. ~

Coupled with the spoiler aspect, then seems to render a potential motion of those being able to pay/compensate said spoiler - then proceeding to victimize those having found more successful paths through common compliance - minding ones own business for instance, and being simply productive - cash and carry sort of designs.

Of course such efforts to procure utilize the appearance of a greater compliance in such influences - even in the fact that such greater compliance to such extremes as to be flaunted and reasoned as deserving being evidence of/to themselves as being to the contrary.

But, I suppose that few would recognize that in modern popular perception - Maybe such is from where the adage rich get richer first began? ~

It definitely presents different approaches to the idea of Christ. ~

The immediate result in design rendering such a scapegoat - even from the spoiler element. ~

The longevity result in such a design rendering such as concept within which better results can arise from said simple application of simple compliance through existence. ~

It seems then a division of immediate perceived results and the potential in experiencing existence. ~

Given the tendencies of people in general - it seems the designs in use for longevity would need be in a rather large sense. Perhaps something large enough to accommodate the more desperate tendencies within even itself - though unknown to any (given those tendencies). ~

Thus far then, that even through the hideous descriptions of curses and plundering - the most efficient course within it, is simple existence with attentions to ones interests - performing ones profession with earnest for example (as per honest measure) - and of course without too much ambition in attempting to look as more in compliance - especially given as is stated that all of these blessings and curses were to transpire.

Such being further substantiated in 29:19.

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY: 12/21/2006 (Did They Drink So Much, They Forgot They Drank Anything At All?)

2007-02-22T12:37:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/21/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

Did They Drink So Much, They Forgot They Drank Anything At All?

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/21/2006

Again in Chapter 29 of Deuteronomy, is yet another repetition with yet another peculiar augmentation concerning alcohol. For some reason at this point it is said that no alcohol was consumed since leaving Egypt.

It further describes the Israelites as without faculties such as understanding or similar sight and hearing in same suggested ways. ~

Chapter 29 then makes other differentiations, including an air of the covenant just being established - suggesting that all previous was not of the covenant - even stating that the present act of entering into the covenant will establish the Israelites as his people. ~

This even after again having likened those present with those having left Egypt - then further stating that their future generations will be of the terms as well.

Those who are not standing here today. ~

29:18 then again presents a tone as if Moses were God; I am making this covenant with you.... ~

29:20 then reveals an aspect of the bible which few consider, even beyond the stated instruction aspect - being that it is a book of curses as well as blessings in the literal sense, stating curses to be written in it quite blatantly in that verse. ~

Such again very much points to a multiple aspect in a single focus, even though human tendency itself is frequently to extremes.

This presents a God having ability toward severe brutality and kindness. Something which modern society does not even accept of individuals. Especially in an open manner - thus forcing many into social inversions due to peer pressure.

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY: 12/20/2006 (continued) - (The Devil Can Do That, Too! Devour your Children!)

2007-02-17T10:18:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/20/2006

(continued)

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

The Devil Can Do That, Too! Devour your Children!

And of course, the imposed suggestive suggestions, suggesting suggestive interactions!

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/20/2006 (continued)

28:20 of Deuteronomy further presents curses for disobedience. It gives reason to consider the potential dangers in such curses - unless of course a person is aware of their own level in compliance - given the relationship (and known rivalry) between the Lord and Lucifer. Especially considering what is widely known as a popular tactic fro the Devil in considering such a proposed duality and dichotomy - being mimicry.

How easy would it be with such discord, for the Devil to level similar results resembling the effect in result of such curses?

Even utilizing the same reasoning in destroying any with designs of abandoning the mimicry as if to be the Lord punishing wayward action? ~

Again and especially at this point in time regarding this ideology - such efforts of/in entirely separating the idea of good and evil in our world presents only potential destruction(s) untold. ~

Such consideration and reasoning bolsters my perspective and opinion regarding the efficiency of such ideology(ies) in our modern day - most especially beyond the idea of Christ and further given the depth at which humanity already employs daily, that which was/would have been considered extreme abomination in that time period. ~

I still contend that the work itself is best understood as an entire consideration - given that such would be the desired result in considering it at all. though it is that within it are the particulars still in motion which obviously comprise it. ~

Yet again perhaps example of paradox/dichotomy - and further human growth and development of capacity and understanding. ~

28:25 continues with curses for extreme disobedience, but now turns the potential scattering in seven directions into a possibility for the Israelites under the wrath of their enemies - sending even defeat of the Israelites for failure to comply. ~

Of course, as history shows, the Israelites were conquered - but as well in the same history can be seen the use of those conquering societies to actually further the belief structure itself - even providing for several mutations between it and existing hosts having conquered them, which very much is an attribute in my opinion of the soundness of at least the consistencies having been established as per a motion of social development. ~

Such a shift in social normality from overt conquerors to conquered residence seems only to have provided further potential for the more socially geared aspects of the previously proposed consistencies and conquering.

The infiltration aspects so to speak, whether or not such was intended at the time. The consistency of/between existing social influences - as a matter of course has even given rise to mighty nations of themselves, with no direct affiliation to those initial consistencies. ~

It is within these passages containing curses for failure to comply, that more insight is brought to the introduction of Christ and more so in the time period that such transpired - after having been conquered to a greater or lesser degree. ~

It also gives more consideration to the idea of an employed mimicry transpiring (at least potentially) in the conquering nations doing themselves, things described as to transpire in the event(s) of such non-compliance as would mandate curses. ~

Such a social area considering the attempts of other nations to posture as bringers of supposed punishment - occurs to me as a potential birthplace of Ecclesiastics - Church Politics so to speak being employed within the and as the potential postured punishment, there then arises the potential of postured compliance in reaction while further facilitating more political subject matter in regard to both tendencies. ~

A person really has to wonder at the common (and seemingly implied) interpretation and understanding of this work as to be a literal mandate through and through given the severity for failure of such a collection of rules and standards in that literal sense. ~

A person could reason from such angles that perhaps - in that literal and rigid direction - that it was decidedly failed in that sense before it even continued on. Especially at this point of the work, itself. ~

To realize within this apparent example of extreme in regard to the observable motion within it and to consider something such as 28:15, to somehow supersede and outweigh the previous and larger design for remitting atonement - then it is that this body of people were most definitely cursed. ~

But - in regarding the work in motion of it, as an entirety, not only are the extremes of a potential duality and multiple aspect revealed more obviously within the current passages - but the wisdom in considering the work in an entirety becomes more obvious as well. ~

How could it be reasoned that the God presenting ceremony and consistency - avenues for atonement of/for transgressions - be the same comprised elemental body which now pronounces some rather extreme curses if they do not obey all of the commands and decrees? ~

This extreme displays the pronounced possibility within the multiple/single aspect I have described. ~

Further in considering these passages filled with some rather inhuman descriptions as curses - then provides, as stated, an amount of probability in/for the eventual introduction of Christ - further, with that introduction of Christ as result and in effort presumably to stave the continuance of such curses, it then suggests from my present perspective in the modern day - that perhaps the existing writ/decree of the time was not itself recognized as of distinct extremes of influence - then further, does not seem to have been regarded as a work in entirety. Though, such contradicts the previous presented social dynamic and potentials in such a consideration as the work not being recognized as an entirety. ~

At the risk of being seen as a heretic, this inconsistency then points most definitely to the imposed aspects of such curses from other - perhaps conquering - civilizations from the perspective which chose to ignore the larger work as entirety. ~

In that then, perhaps forcing the very necessitation of the idea of Christ within those more political turmoils - to counter the oppressive and imposed aspects of confined and literal interpretation(s) of such curses. ~

Perhaps having been conquered somehow then presented a perceived understanding that such curses were in effect, while progressively removing the options for atonement with the oppression? ~

02/14/2007 As further note within this consideration, it is entirely possible that such confined perspective as result of being conquered and oppressed, the facilitated further the larger progress - even more so, facilitated the confined and contained perspective of those conquering enemies pertaining to the larger body of the work itself. Somehow failing to see the larger motion of it as it transpired within and of that larger, ongoing consideration - much within the act of oppression itself.

But of course, as mentioned, such was only a given aspect of the resulting transition in being conquered. Other facets obviously continued in the furtherance of said consistencies. ~

Even being similar to some areas within said curses - then leading a person to wonder if such design in curse was not actually a blessing in disguise, so to speak - through facilitating the further and more diverse establishment of the existing consistencies. ~

28:36 and 28:64 demonstrate this in then considering a consistency fo being exiled over and again - while maintaining levels of the previous consistency(ies) ~

Again, in considering the possibility that the means for atonement were removed - it then very much is that the figure of Christ is necessitated and very much is substantiated in/from such reasoning's when considering the idea presented in symbolic transference of flesh and blood. ~

If God was the Israelites King, and Christ was presented as the son of God, then it is (as previously explored), that Christ was then symbolically the son of all Israelites - even the Israelites themselves. ~

This can then be seen as relation to the curses such as devouring ones own children as sustenance - through then attaching it symbolically to the action of consuming unleavened bread and wine - which further then, related to pass over. ~

Within the relation with pass over, is another turn in development symbolically in the reference to Christ being the lamb of God and the wine representing his blood - such then would direct a transference to the houses having been marked for pass over with lambs blood, perhaps to encompass all of the Israelites in that point of contact. ~

Such is, among other things - a definite area of yet another divergence. This being obvious in the continuance of the Hebrew faith and of course the manifestation of Christianity in various forms - though it is a notable interest that among many of the obvious actions Christ was said to have done - and further those actions having been remarkable similarities in a contrary sense to many of the curse in the passages - within that obvious divergence, some of those curses continued in progression and development both relating to the motion of Christianity and the motion of the previous consistencies - separately to some degree it seems. ~

Considering the level of transference and symbology thus far within the work - now even noted as Book of instruction - it becomes more and more obvious that even the necessitation of Christ to serve as such a tool for transference, was very much inevitable and further, politically motivated.

Within the already existing forms of transference seems to have been adequate means to accommodate the extremes of such curses as eating ones own children and the sort. ~

The present comparison with Christ then further presents a larger, self consuming cycle within the applied context of lamb and un-leavened bread, as well - which even heightens the divergence at the introduction of such. ~

In some perspectives, it could even be reasoned that the results of such introduction, was more a continuance than the creation of other faiths. this in considering the initial (though only partial intent) action in association with the Israelites and pass over with the actions of Christ - but setting into motion within that divergence - a self consuming cycle in progression - however symbolically (within those lines of consideration). ~

The biggest difference I suppose is then a matter of perceived distance given the present curse to consume ones own children greedily even, where that which can be discerned within the resulting symbolism of related areas in the actions of Christ - places a distance to the initial pass over, through transference at given points of contact. ~

28:68 is something I have as of yet to hear of transpiring in the curse of the Israelites being sent back to Egypt, offering themselves as slaves only to be refused. ~

02/14/2007 To note on this in current study - it is recently within the book of 1 Kings, that Solomon - the son of David, takes Pharaohs daughter as his first wife.... then, as it is described as having transpired, Solomons son loses the majority of the kingdom to an individual having fled from Solomon to Egypt - only to return with Solomons death. Symbolically, such could be of relation to some degree.

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY: 12/20/2006 (The Scent Of Blood In The Wild? Heads And Tails? Does Across The Street Change?)

2007-02-15T14:42:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/20/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

The Scent Of Blood In The Wild? Heads And Tails? Does Across The Street Change?

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/20/2006

It is rather notable to have stated that enemies will scatter in seven directions - the common ritual regarding sacrifice at the time was in sprinkling blood upon the altar 7 times. Perhaps a relation within that as well even further than the idea suggested of blood. ~

Though it is a bit of speculation, considering the described idea that burnt offerings are a pleasing aroma to the Lord - this would then suggest a level of relation in an olfactory sense which could then easily be applied to the relation of blood sprinkled seven times, and the symbolic association of enemies then being spattered with it, in that sense. Such as chum for a shark so to speak. ~

Given that cooking flesh was acknowledged and further that blood is even said to have been reserved for the Lord in some instances - it seems that the symbolism within that is akin to smearing honey on someone near grizzlies. As well, the bread of suffering is consumed for 7 days during pass over. ~

This affiliation with enemies and 7, then seems to create another symbolic relation as well - in affiliating them with a proximity (though symbolically) with the altar and even the ark of the covenant - again, given that the blood is sprinkled seven times. ~

This line of thought then suggests a slightly different capacity (perhaps) of the altar and ark itself. Presumably through this line of reasoning, employing it in a curse like manner as in symbolically entrapping the enemy within those commandments and somewhat between the Lord and the proposed agreement with/for the Israelites. Symbolically exposing them (the enemy) to their own faults in regard to the presented Israelite belief structure. Knowing them to obviously not be in compliance. ~

If it were thought that the ark and altar held the focus of a larger influence in the contained manner previously explored - in or near which only safe existence could transpire through the established consistencies and conditioned atmosphere - then, within that belief structure, it is no far leap to realize that such exposure outside of those consistencies would be thought to have adverse effects on those not sufficiently within the confines of the established consistency/conditioned atmosphere. ~

Again, providing it were thought that such ritual and belief structure honed and contained at least a portion of a larger influence. Perhaps similar as could be a constructed wind break within a perpetual wind storm? As said contained influence may have been similar to in regard to comparison as per understanding. The wind break being representative in this example, of the existing consistencies relating to this explorative example. ~

28:13 of Deuteronomy puts forward another metaphor that is intriguing in regard to prospective reward for compliance with the commands having been issued by the Lord. Such compliance is said to always make you the head, not the tail and always the top, not the bottom. ~

Beyond this obviously being metaphor suggesting a series of one being preferable to the other - a person is drawn to consider what it may reference; Head and Tail of? Top and bottom of? ~

This then presents a duality in presence yet again and rather in a firm manner in this instance providing that the Lord perceives a Top and Bottom and a Head and Tail. ~

Given the statement of tail and further the consistency of anything (most anything) having a tail at this point has become a sacrifice in one form or another - it kind of takes away from the initial allure presented within such a statement. ~

Perhaps then further, given the previous issued decree that the Israelites were not good and a stubborn people, the Lord might actually not be expecting entire and total compliance to have been possible - which, in a broader consideration of applied social, then would relegate the Israelites to somewhere in the middle on average - given human tendency.

Neither head nor tail nor top nor bottom in that greater perspective. ~

This of course not being in comparison to other civilizations/cultures - but only in consideration of human tendency and the suggested possibilities within this belief structure itself. ~

This then further substantiated in considering the result in that sense, of the opposing presented extremes of curse in perceived disobedience and blessing in compliance.

Then yet further in considering the presented ability and means through which to atone for transgressions with the act and action(s) of celebration. Provided it was done in a somewhat conducive manner regarding desired result in effect of blessing and curse punishment. ~

Personally, in regard to top and bottom as suggested in the more grand sense within the time period issued - from my perspective in the modern day in considering even the result of such introduced structures and the subsequent mutations over time - it doesn't seem that their is a possible top in that sense - nor perhaps even a discernable and likewise constant bottom - though within the continued motion of such social designs - there are somewhat extreme examples of both. ~

This, as such social structure(s) continue in progress with, within and even of other similar social designs in motion. ~

(Other Notes Pertaining To The Motion Of Concept Into Realization Through The Process Of 'Progress')

In another angle of perspective regarding the possible context of such statements as top and bottom - wouldn't it be reasonable then that the top is a comparison even with the idea of God in that sense, being presumably the most high? ~

Then what of considerations in perspective(s) concerning possible motion between our plane of existence and that of the Lord within this ideology? ~

It would stand to reason given the examples of pronounced extremes, that such a motion exists - which in effect then would seem to result in an unrecognized shift in perspective.

For example, within the consideration of a possible difference in that motion; the top being on the side at times, and even at a position once having been regarded as bottom though not acknowledged as such within and through the insulated area of difference. ~

Meaning perhaps that the Lords perspective (similar to our likeness being similar as described) sees things only in and from said perspective as do we, from our own perception of our own surroundings without regard for what may transpire in regard to a position respect in such a relationship - between the different perspectives. ~

Our the top and the bottom always being seen from our perspective as our the top and the bottom - and likewise the Lords perspective; The top and The bottom always remaining consistent from that perspective - but the relation between the separate sets of the top and the bottom actually having a non-fixed relationship. At times even only juxtaposed instead of a direct opposite consideration.

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY; 12/19/2006 (continued II) - (Odd Or Even? Rock, Paper, Scissors? You Guys Stand Over There, And We Will Stand Over Here?)

2007-02-15T14:40:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/19/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

(continued II)

Odd Or Even? Rock, Paper, Scissors? You Guys Stand Over There, And We Will Stand Over Here?

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/19/2006 (continued II)

Chapter 26 is another review of offerings and tithes for harvest, though 26:05 indicates the Israelites stem from the Arameans through Jacob. ~

26:12 then again addresses every third year tithes to be that of the Levites, foreigners, orphans and widows. ~

A particular augmentation in this instance is in 26:14 with the importance of not having consumed any of the tithe during mourning, or handled it while ceremonially un-clean - and further not having offered any of it to the dead. ~

26:15 indicates the Lord to be on high in asking that he look down from your holy dwelling place in heaven... - suggesting an aloof aspect to God in this instance instead of the co-existing aspects previously indicated. ~

Genesis 1 states God as creating the heavens and earth. ~

This recent reference then suggests some affiliation directly with the heavens, as a dwelling place. ~

Is this then a removed reference to the sun? This in consideration of such being common of various previous social structure influences - Egypt for instance? ~

Does such a reference then firmly indicate a visitation aspect within the references of walking among you? ~

Does it indicate times when God is elsewhere? ~

Then yet as further consideration; Given that, as put forward in Genesis 1, God created heavens and earth...., and it is now in the heavens where God does reside. There must surely be something beyond, in that regard. ~

From where ever God created the Heavens and Earth. ~

As a total nut case venture here, I could say that this line of reasoning substantiates my previous exploration(s) in consideration of all that we know of the universe - more so, all of which we know it to be comprised of was actually at one time a huge planet like object, itself. So large as to not be possible for us to see it if it weren't they we existed within the remnants of it, in such a speculation. ~

A planet like object which broke apart somehow - rendering that which we call the universe. Itself only still maintaining some semblance of the previous objects path in some orbit like motion of its own. ~

Consider objects out there beyond our own universe so huge that we cannot even see them? ~

All within a similar organized motion as we see of our own galaxy and universe. ~

Such stands to reason within the consistencies observable. ~

Chapter 27 then again addresses Mt. Gerizim and Mt. Ebal. In this description it is further described with noting a specific assignment of tribes and on which mountain they are to stand in issuance of curse and blessing. ~

6 tribes each are to have stood on each mountain, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Issachar, Joseph and Benjamin were to have stood atop Mt. Gerizim to proclaim a blessing and Reuben, Gad, Asher, Zebulun, Dan and Naphtali were to stand atop Mt. Ebal to proclaim a curse. ~

This is further an interesting development in stating that the Levites will have then shouted to the people, a series of curses. This, even in the fact that they are previously noted as being set atop Mt. Gerizim to pronounce blessings. ~

In a slightly larger sense, this then adds to the potential dynamic in regard to political relation and interaction between the tribes and in/within the established separation in divergence previously described and explored. ~

So it is in this relation that Reuben, Gad and half of Manasseh (Joseph) remained on the East side of the river, while all others and half of Manasseh went to the West side of the river.

Reuben and Gad having been atop Ebal, while Manasseh was atop Mt. Gerizim. ~

From immediate consideration this then created a balanced presence of 4 voices (2 each Ebal and Gerizim) on the East side of the river - with a 6 and 4 voice split on the West side being Gerizim and Ebal, respectively. ~

The Levites then serving a double representation in that grouping having been assigned atop Gerizim and as well assigned to pronounce the curses. ~

While this serves a similar representation on the East side, it seems that with the half tribe presence within such a dynamic, would result the more balanced inclination. ~

28 then describes blessings and further has yet another reference to seven (7). In 28:07 it describes the blessings of enemies will attack from one direction, but will scatter from you in seven. ~

Though this is entirely a different context in which the reference to seven has been previously issued, it is still a quite purposeful use in reference to it for the purpose of illustration. ~

If then, in yet more speculation a person associates 7 with the Star of David, and then further in that line - with Christ - who was said to have been of that blood line (and there-fore continuing affiliation with the Star of David), it could be reasoned that (within that affiliation) the idea of Christ is then refuge from the wrath of God on behalf of the most blessed of the Israelites. Though again, within that speculation - only the most righteous of them - and only toward those having attacked from one direction I presume. ~

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY: 12/19/2006 (continued) (No Package Abuse! God Doesn't Want Hooker Money? Developing Commerce And Utopian Designs?)

2007-02-10T06:42:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/19/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

(continued)

No Package Abuse! God Doesn't Want Hooker Money? Developing Commerce And Utopian Designs?

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/19/2006 (continued)

25:11 then seems to present a limit to such direction(s) of power for the female - through describing what is considered punishable in the loss of her hand should the woman grab the testicles of a man her husband is in a fight with. ~

From certain perspectives this could be seen as acknowledging the importance of virility, much in a certain respect as extending the previous powers to a female having been denied in certain situations - though in this example, demonstrating a different approach to the same respect. ~

25:13 then again shows decided concern for and with good commerce practices; scales and weights and honest measures. ~

Then something rather surprising in the context of miscellaneous consistency within these miscellaneous guidelines, is 25:17. It describes a mandate to be sure and destroy the Amalekites - and to erase their memory from under heaven. ~

This chapter itself seems as a good example pertaining to the larger motion I have observed within existence. Considering it without the presented individual meanings (designs within the context of subject matter) - it is possible to see what I am exploring in that larger sense. ~

It could almost be categorized as excerpts from the thoughts of different individuals at a given point in time - perhaps in a given amount of time as it transpired. ~

For consideration in presenting this perspective, note the procession of the chapter;

Right and wrong decision in court/40 lashes,
Ox on a treadmill,
A widows want of a child,
Two fighting men and a wife,
Honest weights and measure,
Rest before destroying the Amalekites

Again, they are under a sub-title of miscellaneous - but the movement through various subject matter in such a procession, is the aspect of motion I refer to in regard to that larger influence and motion. ~

Purely as speculation then in regard to this series in motion of seemingly un-related things - it is very much that within this single focus/multiple aspect, that the larger consistency then becomes the community itself. ~

Within the series of examples in chapter 25, it could be derived (if only for speculation in illustrating this produced larger consistency) that we have as example potentially;

Elders considering just punishments in hypothesizing among themselves
Then perhaps the concerns of a millwright in discovering a more efficient route than denying the ox with a muzzle
Then perhaps the concerns of co-inhabitants (in-laws) as they interact among themselves
Then further perhaps an extension of those concerns/conversation as the hypothetical subject matter changes
Then perhaps the concerns of a farmer pertaining to the sale of crops
Then perhaps the concerns of someone remembering previous battles.

Again, this is entirely speculation on my own part - but such in the interest of better depicting that larger motion through the use of potential results in the manner described. ~

Given the prominent aspect as stated pertaining to the Lord living among them, I would even go as far in speculation as to suggest such results in said procession being perhaps from a given feast/festival. Such subject mater could easily be considered as common conversations - even only culminations of said within such grand celebrations and feasts as have been described. ~

Samples so to speak - though being the culmination of various proximities in regard to such interactions - hypothetically - as one point of interest moved to another. ~

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY; 12/19/2006 (Divorce In The Age Of Eye For Eye? How Liberal! I Want A Year Off Of Work To Honey Moon?)

2007-02-09T07:12:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/19/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

Divorce In The Age Of Eye For Eye? I Want A Year Off Of Work To Honey Moon?

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/19/2006

Chapter 24 again displays a rather liberal aspect in citing the possibility of divorce through issuance of a letter. Of course at this point in time, it is rather one sided compared to the one sided aspects in the modern day, but is a progressive development all the same when considering other social standards in the same time frame both of the Israelites and other societies. ~

Even after such divorce in this period, the female could still marry another. It is only after the second divorce where any limitation is set on marriage for the female. ~

24:05 cites yet another progressive aspect in stating that a newly married man could not be drafted into the military or any other official responsibilities. In fact, it reserves one whole year provided for the man to spend at home bringing happiness to the wife. ~

It would be difficult to find such opportunity in the modern day.

The pace and expense of any semblance of comfort in living, almost entirely demands full time employment - in some cases for both the man and woman in a household. ~

I can only imagine the laughter in the moment that someone requested a year off from work to spend at home with a new wife! For much more than simply the suggestion that a position would be expected to be held for them! ~

24:06 is more display in concerns of healthy commerce practices, as well as 24:10 and 24:14. ~

Again being significant in comparison, to the era and other civilizations. ~

Yet further in such a display pertaining to an interest in healthy society through justice as well. ~

A person can easily see the potential intention(s) toward a Utopia like society, yet again beginning in 24:19 in addition to the concerns for justice and commerce. ~

It is strange though to see profound potential(s) intermingled with what is now considered nearly shocking in regard to punishments. From my perspective in the present, it does seem a bit juxtaposed at least - if not the presence of two distinct extremes.

As a note here, this tends to support further the seeming consistency of idea being introduced long before the most efficiency is derived from it within the progress of the human species. Particularly odd is that existing combination of extremes in potential.

24:16 cites an example of this, being displayed within itself almost; Parents must not be put to death for the sins of their children, nor children for the sins of their parents. Those deserving to die must be put to death for their own crimes. ~

As is seen here, there is a concern for justice - a sort of caring even... but then existing within the extreme of quite common execution. ~

Perhaps evidence of the potential within humanity itself? Such profound presence within even the most harsh of perceived brutalities. ~

Of course and admittedly, such is from my perspective of the modern day within a rather safe society, from within a very modern country. ~

Perhaps it is indicative of the balance as well - within even the progress of existence? ~

Funny how one receding seems to promote the growth of the other! Less actual justice then providing avenue for greater brutality - while less brutality doesn't seem to create the avenue for more actual justice. ~

Such itself proves the tendency of humans as I have explored concerning corruption(s). ~

Quite a precarious area in that regard. ~

Further is displayed certain human qualities concerning justice in chapter 25:01 thru 25:03 of Deuteronomy. It demonstrates yet another seemingly contrary element to the consistent brutality, in limiting the number of lashes a person may issue as punishment so as not to publicly humiliate their neighbor. ~

Then again is suggested an idea that no one at all should go hungry - and especially should not exist in a state of want. 25:04 exemplifies such in mandating that an ox troding grain should not be muzzled to keep it from eating. ~

Though it seems insignificant and perhaps irrelevant - it very much shows a certain level of such concerns - even further in extending the perceived importance of such want even with animals and menial tasks. ~

Yet further this then relates the act of eating (as per some importance - feasts and the like), though it is in this instance, that of an animal. ~

25:05 thru 25:10 again shows remarkable liberal tendencies - this time in regard to a widows recourse in not being sired by her dead husbands brother. ~

It shows a rather potent point of influence in such a situation with the ability in discrediting the family line ever afterward of the situation. ~

In such an instance, after review and judgment, the woman then spits in the brother-in laws face and declares a curse of sorts upon him after removing a sandal from his foot. ~

Beyond the aspects of influence and power in this instance - I find thoughts in regard to the general approach in this example. From my perspective in our modern day, it seems to display a larger consistency through out humanity - more so perhaps a given point in consistent tendencies within a developmental progression of affiliation in the effort to achieve recognition. ~

We still do it it seems, but in a different manner. ~

In this example, the brother in laws family will there after be known as; The family of the man whose sandal was pulled off. ~

This sort of identity through affiliation was quite common in many civilizations in this very same example of tone in relations; A name comprised of something else. Some other descriptive action.

This seems to have then progressed into using likenesses as affiliation as well - then further progressed into language derivatives, housing similar meaning of affiliation. Meaning that after some time, no longer did people directly affiliate themselves with something, some action - but affixed a language derivative (being what we know as names) in the place of direct affiliation. ~

Such is consistent in most civilizations - at least those I can call to mind presently. ~

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY: 12/18/2006 (continued) - (God Doesn't Want Hooker Money? Developing Commerce And Utopian Designs?)

2007-02-08T09:25:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/18/2006

(continued)

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

God Doesn't Want Hooker Money? Developing Commerce And Utopian Designs?

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/18/2006 (continued)

23:17 states that the monies of a prostitute cannot be used as offering.

I suppose then, depending upon a persons interpretation of prostitution and especially within the modern day - such might prove to be a little troublesome. Especially considering that most jobs are not sweat of the brow in the sense of work - which then, in no far stretch of the imagination - could very well be categorized as various forms of prostitution. ~

Again is evidence of developing commerce in 23:19, though it refers to loans given other Israelites - it still remarkably signifies definite commerce. ~

It most definitely presents a fraternal aspect as well within it, given the distinct separations now of Israelites and others living among them. ~

This then in combination with the social and political motion within that exclusive body, presents an even larger area of social dynamic to consider. ~

If I dare to venture here - such could be seen as similar in some ways with the body of elected officials and the general population of the modern United States. Differing of course in the respect that elected officials are not permanently of that intangible skeletal structure. ~

And of course, extracurricular financial ventures aren't always the better option for our modern officials. ~

23:24 states yet another rather communal aspect within a social dynamic. A person could enter their neighbors vineyard and eat their fill of grapes - but was not given permission to carry any away - and similar with heads of grain in a neighbors field, not to be harvested in such a manner as with a sickle. ~

This presents a consideration of very Utopia like designs in regard to such social interactions.

To not want or be in need of anything.

Further, considering the manner in which such was procured to begin with (piracy and plunder) - it then lends to further thought in crediting this movement with rather ground breaking social ideologies. this being pas - of course - the marauding and physically expansionary aspects. ~

A community of formerly nomadic cultures - establishing and even perhaps driving a substantial amount of commerce with the movement of festivities and celebrations within itself - then further establishing such guidelines as allotting for excess to be available to all (fields laying fallow - the most recent example of eating ones fill of grapes and hand fulls of grain, and of course allotting for a form of welfare in other ways), seems from a given perspective to have very Utopia like characteristics - at least in design through such descriptions. ~

I suppose it does stand to reason - though somewhat surprisingly to see so early on, that eventually someone would have to consider more to life than continuous warring. Especially in considering the establishment and maintenance of social aspects of community - especially further in the consideration of building and maintaining commerce independently of other influences while still possessing the ability for such actions and interaction.

As a note in recent considerations I have presented within the course of this topical study; The perspective presented here pertaining to observable Utopia like designs, again stands as example in the idea and reasoning that it seems a consistency such idea and development arise within humanity long before they are entirely understood much less most efficiently employed. Here are visible the beginnings of established forms of commerce which tend to possess the capability of promoting an efficiency beyond the warring aspect.

I do consider that within the observable progression of such, these initial ideas are not stand alone in the sense of verbatim application. That is to say that within the progress of civilization and such understanding as it has developed, is then the development in the consideration of capacity and applied idea.

I do not assert that these are the only examples of early economy. Further I do not assert that they developed on their own and as the only version of such. I do believe that within these designs are elements of modern efficient economy as they have developed and intertwined with other examples.

The idea of economy and commerce is itself entirely of a human importance.. which itself, as I consider it, may initially have been something thought that humanity would develop beyond. Perhaps it may someday... but there is still that pesky want of the thrill of the chase and the sort as those earlier tendencies toward warring have progressed into being represented through such mediums as commerce.

Then of course is the boy fight/girl fight having been derived largely as a means of stimulation to extended areas of and within economy as the most prominent reason I presume. And at this point in civilization, those things just seem too durned much fun to intentionally leave behind as a person could assume imposed development in those areas would entail.

I don't see such progression as happening in such a manner as imposed change. At least in the more efficient desired results I suppose as we continue to be suspended between what is presented as the physical and the cerebral... as if they didn't already co-exist long before some big brain decided they were in charge of separating them and insisting that one must someday be without the other, as it would seem has occurred.

While it seems that in a larger sense, the commerce described could easily become only pushing one stack of coins momentarily to another place - it then is aided with and within the diversity introduced within the social structure - this then preventing that sort of stagnation from occurring. ~

The commerce aspects - and I suspect even that more complicated (new) approach, may have been by design from where ever - as it is repeatedly emphasized that wealth will be with the Israelites. ~

Odd as I consider it, that much of the prevailing mentality from the area such was first implemented, is of the sort that some modern priests encourage people to save their ammunition in celebrating - to put into the chest of their enemies at a later point in time. ~

Such isn't to criticize so much as to observe the developmental extremes - perhaps even between interpretations?

Perhaps it could be seen as stages of influence - those of the initial area having been effected in a backwards motion to some extent; i.e. the development of better war tools happening into their existence from further along that influential progression from considered areas of modern development. Suspending development away from such warring considerations with the path of better warfare.

Even as that influential progression continues to churn with the version of other influences in a more modern setting.

War having transformed within the more progressive areas of that development, into other facets - and perspective having transformed as well within the same motion. ~

Definitely something else to continue considering. ~

Thinking further about this in general - considering the amount of sacrificing and offering within this structure - the Israelites must have been considerable in size at this point in time. the area must have been a much different atmosphere as well, considering the crops and live stock it had to sustain. ~

In then thinking about the Roman influence in conquering the area some time later - as well as Europe, it then gives insight into the direction and means for such sociological development - particularly curious at the moment, is considering the vineyards. Wine was prominent in many cultures of the area long before any Empires much less kingdoms.

While it was very much through the Roman networking as result of conquering most of Europe, that what we know of modern Christianity progressed. It seems that there was some considerable trade off in having been absorbed to some extent within the roman Empire. ~

Such expansion pertaining to the Israelites was then facilitated in ways other than the previous warring - through the Roman expansion. And, as is notable within having been conquered and absorbed, such would represent another fold in the previous consistency of the Israelites becoming influenced by neighboring cultures/societies though in a much larger sense concerning the Roman example. ~

Perhaps within the idea of modern Christianity - such an occurrence could be noted as a part of the development toward and even within, other means of expanding? Perhaps shifting the momentum from the previous bent of warring, to a larger focus of utilizing the result(s) of other - more dominant war machines, and further without their knowledge in that respect.

Utilizing the consistency of the larger social dynamics to maintain the aspects of their own - and even to expand upon it, much in a similar manner as the mentioned process observable particularly within Judges. Though the beginnings of the social motion are even seen within the time of Moses.

This further then producing another facsimile/emulation on a grander scale of the previous social structure. As note; The advent of roman Catholicism. the consistency of that social structure then essentially serving as those among you had previously during their dominance - though now in a much more broad - diffuse geographically - sense within the Roman Empire. Maintaining some level of consistency within their own community - however distant at that point, from one another - similar to that of the previously more contained Nation and Tribes of Israel. ~

Again, though somewhat distant from this point concerning studies - such development then facilitating much in many respects, to that progress in and of development. ~

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY: 12/18/2006 (No Package No Admission! If You Thought Divorce Was Bad? Wet Dreams In Adult Hood?)

2007-02-07T07:45:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/18/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

No Package No Admission! If You Thought Divorce Was Bad? Wet Dreams In Adult Hood?

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/18/2006

21:22 describes the punishment of hanging - and specifically that the person hung should not remain hanging dead from the tree overnight. It says to bury the body the same day. ~

This kind of puts a different light on the development of the Western United States particularly - more in reference to popular lore in even displaying bodies at times for what ever reason. ~

Chapter 22 looks as though it describes some basic social neighborly things in returning that of others and of course lending a hand in troublesome moments with donkeys and oxen. ~

22:05 then turns to dictate the difference between womens clothing and mens clothing in so far as forbidding one to wear the other. ~ This I see really as more in relation to something similar to 22:11, than in some effort to stem cross dressing. 22:11 stating that wool and linen woven together is unacceptable as clothing. I see a similar relationship in reasoning between men and womens clothing's - not to say one is wool and the other linen, but more a relative aspect in meaning - intention. Very much in the idea that (22:09) to plant something between two rows of another crop would then mean that neither could be used. ~

This of course, as we now know - being rather insightful pertaining to the effect of spores on one another - some with potential for mutation. ~

Yet further in suggesting some deeper aversion in such concerns, is the forbidding of plowing with an ox and donkey together. This pattern of separation even extending to types of stitches on clothing in some instances. ~

The reasoning which appears in 22:08 is rather intriguing. If a person were to build a new house, a rail must be included around the edge of the roof in the event that someone should fall from it - the owner would then be absolved of murder as it states. ~

Obviously the intention is in safety precaution(s) - but the murder aspect of a person falling from the roof is a glimpse into the social reasoning's of the time to say the least.

To be guilty of murder in the even that a person fell from the roof? ~

I suppose the distance between more modern reasoning and that display in 22:08, is as much the interesting part. ~

It could even be used in argument pertaining to the idea(s) right and wrong. This of course in the context of conditioned perspectives. ~

It might sound preposterous in the modern day to consider murder as a result of neglecting to install a railing - especially with the various other modern components in/of perspective - though, in simple consideration beyond those conditioned paths and opinions, why then couldn't it be seen as correct reasoning?

22:12 instructs that four tassels must be worn on the hem of a cloak - front, back and sides. ~

This I would presume as initially pertaining to the lunar cycle. Then further, as the compilation of the works called the bible was solidified - then found relation with the fourth book - Numbers - within the developed symbolic logic. ~

22:13 addresses standards for sexual purity. Something that humans are the only creature with reason to worry about. There is no other creature with such concerns. ~

02/07/2007 Something further to note hear about the developed perception of popular Christianity and things presented in instances such as this; There is no indication here of any inclination toward the idea of abstinence being a mandated goal. Such things and perspective, more than likely arose from the application of personal oaths - Nazirite examples and the sort.

Though I find the descriptions within these passages as no less than interesting, it is 22:17 that piques the curiosity - presuming the suggestion in proving virginity was pertaining to a broken hymen in regard to presenting the bed sheets - what of the female that had inadvertently broken the hymen? I suppose in that instance the females father would miss out on the 100 pieces of silver! ~

It calls to mind yet another comparison between/in the distance between modern culture and even interpretations and those depicted within these passages; Marriage itself in that day and age, seems to have been potentially as precarious as in the modern day - with only different reason and social consistencies in play. ~

Even casual relations could cost a person 50 pieces of silver if it was found out! And in some instances death was very much possible in both male and female respects regarding the perceived situation. ~

23 begins with quite the statement! If a mans testicles are crushed or his penis is cut off, he may not be admitted to the assembly of the Lord! ~

Obviously quite the importance placed on virility. This perhaps even as remnant from previous structures in such concerns with potency. Further as a note, this is similar in the context of being an incomplete person in such a state as other civilizations having permitted eunuchs for instance, to retain possession of their testicles in the interest of remaining complete though in fulfilling the service needed. ~

23:02 states that ten (10) generations must pass of a bastard child's line, until they may again be admitted for worship. ~

23:03 continues in addressing the other people in the area and forbids those having turned the Israelites away from joining the assembly of the Lord for ten (10) generations, then further condemns the Ammonites and Moabites in forbidding the promotion of their prosperity. ~

23:07 states that Egyptians may enter the assembly after 3 generations as can the Edomites. ~

23:10, under the title of miscellaneous regulations, states that a defilement due to nocturnal emission must be dealt with through bathing and staying away all day. ~

This is interesting to me in the reference of any man experiencing such. ~

In modern society, wet dreams are usually no longer an occurrence after puberty. ~

Curious that such is suggested as a possibility in that day and age for any man. ~

As a further note - thus far there has been no consideration in regard to female masturbation. It isn't as though they just invented it, of that I am certain! ~

23:12 speaks of latrine sort of standards in a manner that seems to suggest some instruction was needed. The odd aspect of such instruction is that it is put forward describing the digging of a hole for each need for one to relieve ones self. Then further, specifically to cover it each time. ~

Western culture seems to have diverged some in this development and progression - even upwards to the early mid 1900's in some places - the outhouse was rather common and obviously was not covered with every use aside from perhaps a handful of dirt thrown in - and in that, only in certain examples. Then further as note within the urban areas of Western culture for some period, was commonly a chamber pot under the bed or in the closet which many times simply ended up in the street.

23:14 describes excrement as a shameful thing as being reason to bury it with each movement. ~

To again consider the possibility of nocturnal emission for any man - though it is speculation, the consistency of such having become focused during puberty in the modern day, could represent a physiological change - perhaps directly as result of the concentration in focus pertaining to the single deity. ~

To think that perhaps such tendencies became more concentrated to within a given few years in the modern day - isn't all that far fetched and further so in comparison with things such as in 23:10 which suggest that such was common through adult hood as well. Even in considering the much earlier consideration in age constituting man hood from such areas and cultures. ~

23:15 describes that escaped slaves from other places must not be turned over to their masters. And must be allowed to live int he town of their choosing without oppression. ~

Again a similarity of this and the idea of welcoming the refugees of other countries as a citizen populous. ~

Further is an obvious similarity with the underground railroad in the American Civil War era of the United States. ~

Strange to some degree that a culture - new social structure - which employed the presence of its own slaves, would actually put forward such social standards. Immediately I think such would have been as much in the interest of subversion of those other societies which a slave may have escaped from, as in the interest of any humanitarian sort of function. ~

The Israelites, as is obvious at this point, having designs on exponential growth - could gain more in subversion value with such, than in returning them to their former masters. ~

Especially on a large scale sense in the instance that neighboring societies relied heavily on slave labor. To remove the everyday efficiency of those neighboring societies through removing potentially depended upon labor - was to make them all the more vulnerable. ~

That doesn't remove the potential benefits the former slaves could experience though - and in fact, made it all the more possible to find even better treatment and perceived success. ~

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY; 12/17/2006 (The Illusion Of Night And Day? A Quartered Duality?)

2007-02-06T07:26:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/17/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

The Illusion Of Night And Day? A Quartered Duality?

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/17/2006

Considering the developing aspects of duality in several ways within the Bible, I feel I should note the biggest at this point being between the Lunar calender aspects and Popular understanding and perception of it in the modern day, with little consideration of that change over time. ~

This then presents a pattern within the consistencies of it, of dualities within - more so of dualities. This then seeming to present the day and night illusion as some firm separation - where it is of more of a compliance and non-compliance in continuance. This then rendering that which has been seen as development and progress even within itself (all facets of area within those dualities) as well as civilizations and communities which the popularity of it (said pattern of influence) has influenced. ~

There is even an area within the structure of it which seems designed to accommodate those non-compliance particulars until again righted, so to speak. This area for instance, being in those efforts of Aaron required to redeem both his sons (and line) and un-clean animals, regularly. ~

Symbolically this presents what could be seen as a holding area of sorts - a thru way in some senses - and yet further in the beginning of the idea of purgatory. ~

Such demonstrates the continuance aspect as opposed to any reasoning in interpretation of solidified placement. ~

It isn't even so much as good and bad in that larger sense - but again seems as much or more in accommodating existence in an eco-cycle of sorts. Even accommodating the unstable area in existence (within such considerations as said symbology and applied ceremony) of pregnancy for instance, and just after childbirth, within such designs. Creating a conditioned atmosphere of sorts within said symbolism of and even in the extremes. ~

The duality aspects in the larger perception(s) of it, then present within that consistency - no less than 2 heavens and conversely 2 hells in that sense. I would venture then to propose that if it were that such a belief structure were again to be practiced in a removed fashion for several hundred years - perhaps even on a different planet - it would then yield a similar pattern in that progression (particular to atmospheric influences of course) - assuming that it would be from the modern perspective that such would extend from - again, without regard for the previous layer within the Lunar influence in history.

Presenting then, within that extension - an unknown, un- realized extension and subsequent divergence of the previous manner in understanding and perception.. particularly in the presence of several individual Lunar cycles then representing that relative area within the consideration of those multiple influences and single point of focus. ~

I personally think the structure itself would accommodate such a diversity, and perhaps in the longevity of it - then produce variations of and within similar developmental paths we as a species have already seen and experienced. ~

Most especially considering from where, within popular perception, it seems such would be perceived as extension. ~

Would such then create an additional duality between existing, distant versions and that extension - as has been seen to some degree within our civilizations? ~

Then of course within the modern perception is the aspect of having achieved a separation - a level of isolation - between ourselves and those influences in ways I have already explored as well as many others I am sure. ~

Again, in 21:19 is mentioned the Town Gate as a place of judgment and even stoning. Although this instance pertains to a rebellious son - a glutton and drunkard - The reference to town gate again piques my interest in the relation through the constant symbolism's - with relation in a symbolic manner to the door of each house. This particularly in the issuance of decree pertaining to the display of commands and laws on the door/door post.

Further perhaps in a relation with the passover in Egypt and lambs blood?

Then relegating those being judged (and perhaps executed) with/under and in sight of - those commands and the spirit of death as it killed the first born of everything? Symbolising further a community decision in such relation. ~

Further then, within that, affiliating - more so relegating the judged and stoned - to that area of that which was consumed in those instances such as pass over - purging the evil from among the Israelites?

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY: 12/16/2006 (Red Cow Ashes = Tag You're It!, Good And Evil = Night And Day? Even Transgressions as Imprint?)

2007-02-05T06:53:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/16/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

'Eye For Eye' More Memorable Than 'Investigate The Case Thoroughly'

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/16/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/16/2006

12/15/2006 ~ Purification Water - Ashes of Red Cow? Similar relation? Gold glows red in fire light - symbolism of consuming the Golden Calf, gold dust? ~

As noted at the top of the page last evening - in considering the possible symbolic relations in this most recent ceremony and a connection with the Golden Calf as a point of reference/contact - it further occurred to me that another form of duality may be present here - more directly related to the governing aspects of sun and moon perhaps and a decided effort of maintaining a separation of sorts even. ~

This consideration - thought, pertaining to further symbolism and the Golden Calf incident - is pertaining to the purification water. As described, the ceremony to provide purification water includes the use of a red cow to be sacrificed and burned to ashes. ~

A red cow could be seen as symbolising the manner in which a Golden Calf appears in fire light - more so - at night. Perhaps even symbolically being the mother of such an apparition. This then further suggesting that the red cow being sacrificed and burned, is directly related to the Golden Calf at night, perhaps as it shown during the debauchery and sinful activities in worshiping it. ~

Such then further being attributed to the on set of illness within the Israelites as perhaps some remnant effect from the transgressions which occurred during those night time hours affiliated with the Golden Calf. ~

The ashes from the red cow then perhaps representing the result of Moses' actions in grinding the golden Calf to dust and then making the Israelites drink it. ~

Such would explain why anyone involved with the red cow ceremony - those even touching the ash - would be considered un-clean until such actions as described were taken to again make them right with the Lord. ~

The water of purification was used in the removal of sin which supports this line of thought in the same reasoning's of transference as does the medallion, as well. But, more seems in the effort of using a reference to that Golden Calf transgression, to capture the echo's of it - presumably manifesting in said sin and illness. ~

Again, a discerned difference in the relation between the purification water and the previous ceremony near a stream - being one having a closer relation - an affiliation with things having transpired at night at the point of reference being the Golden Calf and the other of the day time perhaps and the stream before having worshiped the false idol. Perhaps even as if to symbolize what was then seen as to have been the better path with the sacrifice of the cow at the stream. A symbolic, preemptive removal of the direction which yielded the Golden Calf incident. ~

Further, as similarity between the red cow and the most recent cow used ceremonially, is in the descriptions of them both never having been yoked to a plow. ~

This then presents further duality in the fact that it takes place within the Lunar calendar. Which of course places an affiliation more directly with the night time hours, than those of the sun. The duality being kind of forced in this instance having the decided evil being associated with Lunar as well as the presence of the Golden Calf. ~

This then reveals more of a cross roads aspect - a fork in the tree so to speak which is a bit different than the linear chronological illusion - common perception of the work itself. ~

This presents - if only through the continued symbolism(s) - the potential of a place if even in only an existential manner - where it is that such things as said ceremonies and symbolism's lead to in the sense of connection. Further, it provides for the consideration of a simultaneous continuance as well - if only through the presented duality. That is to say - the Israelites could at any time, be the same Israelites as were present at the Golden Calf as well as at any time then being the Israelites having followed Moses.

Perhaps yet again, if only manifesting symbolically as such in relation to a larger cycle - further only as a very limited example of potential combinations there-in (of the multiple potentials) through the set and firmed reference points within the larger motion itself - again, being the Golden Calf and conversely the issuance of the Lords decree. ~

This then, in an existential consideration regarding the Golden Calf point of reference, then presents off set echo's with the use in consistency of that specific point of reference then combined with/in the present example reason for referencing it. Each time being that point of reference and the addition of a different introduction of variables with a given present example within the continuance relationship. ~

This as well then being true of other points of reference to and with such examples of consistent representation. ~

So in that then, it isn't necessarily a symmetrical split in the tree so to speak. ~

I would imagine then that the pattern in that motion of such reference, is then quite similar in some degree with that developing motion in chronological personality which is appearing in loose consistency within the work itself. ~

In a larger consideration then, this presents the indication that such concerns as good and evil aren't concerns of night and day. ~

Further, that even known infractions serve potentially as even better points of contact/reference - than do others, suggesting then even more potential importance in effect of positions and presence of variations due to pronounced percentage level in a sort of imprint. ~

Such would stand to reason in regard to theological idea(s), given that within the context of good and evil, both tend to focus upon, and have a use for even the presence of supposed transgressions - for what ever reason. ~

21:15 describes the rights of first born sons. Incredible contradiction concerning the majority of what Israel is built on - being the youngest son. ~

There must be a deeper reason for such - especially the obvious manipulations which rendered the youngest having received the blessings of the eldest. Considering it, and further the willingness of the mother in that instance to commit the deception, perhaps the eldest - Esau - was of a different sire all together? Perhaps deeper than a proximity effect concerning the described differences between Jacob and Esau, and in considering the various instances where it was said to have been at least a possibility of her engaging in intercourse with another during their travels? That Esau was not really the eldest son of their marriage, but was only treated as such - other than blessings? ~

02/05/2007 As a note in thought while transposing these notes - perhaps it even had to do with an inversion of perception. More so recognized perception so to speak? A level of attention within the perceptions which somehow rendered Jacob being seen somehow as having the right to the first born privilege - and within such an inversion of perception, was then seen as being more of a focal point than was the eldest? For example; Jacob being the youngest most often would focus attention on Esau as the eldest, where within their relationship, Esau probably gave little attention toward Jacob - commonly as per modern sibling relationships, such would stand to reason especially considering the described interests of Esau and out door activities.

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY: 12/14/2006 - (Eye For Eye More Memorable Than Investigate The Case Thoroughly)

2007-02-02T09:12:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/15/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

Eye For Eye More Memorable Than Investigate The Case Thoroughly

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/15/2006

Chapter 19 is pertaining once again to the cities of refuge and further specifies that the land is to be divided into three (3) districts - with one of those cities in each district. ~

It then continues to describe again, guidelines for the cities of refuge as well as brief gist pertaining to various situations in severity of judgment. ~

This again displaying the beginnings of a sort of equal justice beyond eye for eye within the community of Israelites. ~

In 19:08 there is what could be seen as evidence of the intention to continue the expansion of the holdings of the Israelites - in instructing that 3 more of these cities should be established if the 'Lord' enlarges the territory. ~

It has already been divulged that six of those cities should be devised which initially indicates a further plan for expansion. ~

In other consideration of this - it demonstrates another chronological discrepancy in that it is now entirely possible that we see in Chapter 19 of Deuteronomy, the earlier design in idea for such cities before the larger expanse of land was won. ~

If nothing else, the previous decree of six (6) cities of refuge is in use of the standard(s) presented here as per expansion and additional cities of refuge. And of course as mentioned, illustrates a slight fault in continuity pertaining to the illusion of chronological transition from book to book and chapter to chapter - placed and woven in with the consistent re-occurrence (points of contact). ~

In 19:21 is presented the ever famous eye for eye..., but as mentioned - this seems to be somewhat of a contradiction between intentions. ~

It suggests (and is often understood) as some call for justified vengeance - and is never considered in the context of the guidelines presented previously in the chapter. ~

Quite strange to consider human tendency in such interpretations! Notable how eye for eye is much more memorable than is investigate the case thoroughly. And further yet in the seeming contradiction of 19:06 showing efforts to actually thwart wrongful death and persecution. ~

Chapter 20 addresses regulations for war and again shows quite a progressive element considering the time of issue. Especially beginning in 20:05 where it describes pre-battle role call and reasons to be excused from battle. ~

Odd that in the very same chapter is again issuance of genocide like instructions of killing every man in the town, with that being the kinder version set forward for cities far away where plunder may be taken as well - including women. ~

As for the towns of the land they are about to enter; Every living thing is to be destroyed as a form of cleansing and insuring no disruption is introduced into their social structure as they settle within the land - taking over their land and settling in their towns and homes. ~

Then further within these seemingly conflicting elements of standard, is yet another queer subtlety pertaining to the forbidding of the razing of trees in or near towns being attacked. Particularly sparing the fruit trees and regulating enough to make only needed equipment of any other sort of tree, which may be cut down. ~

This definitely indicates the intention to preserve as much as possible of that which is then to be assimilated, absorbed as if their own. ~

In another sense, such decree does seem as though it would present a razed result to the areas being assailed. ~

Go kill everyone in town, but try not to chip the paint... and be sure to wipe your feet before you go in! ~

Chapter 21 is another remarkable use of transference in several manners. It pertains to finding a person having been murdered in a field - outside of a town so to speak. ~

Elders and judges must measure the distance to the nearest town from the site of the crime, and then proceed with a ceremonial selection of a young cow of a specific type, to then be taken to a valley (canyon - though presented from a perspective of having lived atop mountains) with a stream, and then be put to death (sacrificed) through breaking the cows neck. Then of course blessings are to be pronounced as well as other ceremony and further actually likening the cow to the dead person. Speaking of it as if it were a person. ~

Particularly interesting beyond the transference of affiliation between the murder victim and the cow - is the specific requirement for a valley with a stream, and as well in choosing the town closest to the crime scene from which the cow is chosen. ~

What is it that would be more likely seen by the Lord about a valley with a stream than anywhere else? ~

Perhaps this specifically indicates such occurrence being addressed in that differentiation beyond the ceremonial aspects - being a somewhat unique setting? ~

What of the suggestion in comparison between the cow and the victim - that the life force somehow finds the nearest acceptable host - being recognized presumably in the description of reasons to choose a cow? ~

Though perhaps a bit of a tangent - what then of the similarity between that suggested tendency of life force flow, and the natural tendencies of a stream to follow the least resistant path? ~

What of a relation between the stream from which Moses forced the consumption of the Golden Calf remnants and the specific presence of a stream in this instance - coupled with the use of a young cow in such ceremony? ~

Is such a ceremony an example itself of a point of contact with that time in the Lords presence at Sinai? ~

Given the often referenced presence of the Lord at Sinai, such would stand to reason - as well perhaps in explaining the relationship between an Israelite and a young cow, with the golden calf point of contact and the consumption of the fine gold dust from it. This of course within the transference from Israelite to Israelite in the previous manner explored in something such as Moses addressing the most recent generation(s) of Israelites, as if they were - or were at least embodiment as representation of those generation(s) from Exodus. ~

It seems within the consistency of symbolism, that such would stand to reason.

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY: 12/14/2006 - continued II -(Judgement Guidelines - Acceptable Inconsistencies? - Competition With The Jones's In Wanting A King?)

2007-02-01T08:47:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/14/2006

(continued II)

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/14/2006 (continued II)

In Chapter 17 of Deuteronomy, there are some general guidelines relating to cases and judgement. Something I find peculiar is another contradiction pertaining to forces of heaven and the stars. It forbids their worship, but in Genesis 1:16 it is described as God having created the sun, moon and stars to govern day and night.

The bible itself thus far is set within the Lunar Calendar cycle. ~

This would seem then, to set apart a difference in being governed and worshiping. ~

02/01/2007 As a note pertaining to potentials within this, I consider in comparison to further studies and consistencies seeming to develop, that perhaps it is in such a line of differentiation that the intention is to discourage the tendency to impose that which can be discerned directly, and then within that opting for the governance of a more flowing aspect beyond the limitation(s) of human derivation and implementation? To allow more the subtle aspects of such a proposed influence to manifest in a more efficient manner than the purposefully implemented version(s) through human effort - and of course the very limited aspects within such a confined consideration? Presenting the opportunity for that which was considered to be, to more efficiently flow and manifest without the direct concentrated attention(s) and effort of human tendencies.

Something else I am compelled to explore at this, is again - the fact that inconsistencies have been left in the work itself over centuries. ~

Immediately I consider perhaps a larger aspect of duality - juxtaposition in occurrence/motion. ~

Then further consider such inconsistencies as perhaps points of contact themselves, within that seemingly inverted duality. ~

While not being blatant contradictions - there are rather consistent, inconsistencies in that sense - again, which have been left in the book through centuries and regimes of the sort that were even gravitated toward various large censorships in other instances. ~

17:05 describes the necessity to take judged offenders to the gates of the town to be stoned to death. ~

I see a relation here to the door and door post(s) for some reason, in a magnified sense. Perhaps it is relative in my mind as being an entry way, and further as has been described - decree is to be displayed on the door/door post(s). ~

17:14 presents yet another contradiction in the idea of selecting a king - when it has already been stated that the Lord is the King of Israel. Further it seems strange that like other nations around would be acceptable when so little if any other social standard pertaining to other around, is. ~

Though it is stated that it could only be a man the Lord chooses, it seems an odd turn in the consistency of development at this point. ~

17:17 again shows proofs contrary to many opinions pertaining to God being of a feminine anatomy component in stating that many wives would turn a kings heart away from the Lord. ~

It further describes that he must not accumulate large amounts of wealth. ~

And, in looking at these guidelines, I further see a metaphoric representation in the direction of creation and development of the United States - though again, most likely as sample influence of social consistencies of the day. Beginning at 17:15, a person can easily compare the King position of President as it was/and developed into modern reality. Save of course within the developments - the idea of King and continued reign of consecutive terms. ~

Chapter 18 concerns the Levites and what they are entitled to as described in Deuteronomy as well as other points previously - with of course subtle changes to accommodate the new social dynamic in domestic living. ~

It is also put forward within this chapter, that Levites can minister in which ever town(s) they choose to live in - even in towns they choose to move to and are still entitled to their share of offerings even if receiving support from elsewhere. ~

In 18:09 is an example - though slight - of a contradiction recently sighted pertaining to King and other nations - it states not to imitate the detestable customs of those other nations. ~

Of course it then cites ritual sort of customs such as sacrificing children, omens...etc. ~

But the slight oddity is still there in the development of at least the possible position of King. ~

There is a decidedly political aspect to this which very much indicates a limit in perspective within the time frame - even as progressive as much of the rest of it seems to be. ~

It is as though such a leadership position is seen as inevitable in some sense - even within the established political and social structure. Such is my reasoning in seeing it as somewhat confined to the time period of its issue. As if there weren't any other known options - even in the specific limitations described as to be of such a position within the community of Israel should it arise. ~

Then further in Chapter 18 of Deuteronomy is indicated perhaps another slight shift in emphasis with describing what earlier was to be conquering and destroying other nations, is now cited as to displace them. ~

18:15 predicts that God will rise up a prophet from within the Israelites. Further it is stated as Moses speaking; A prophet like me. ~

A person could even give consideration that this predicts Christ - but Christ was said to be the son of God. Moses was a son of Amram - though an adopted child to some degree of Pharaohs daughter. ~

It then describes a method to discern the prophet from false prophets as seeing if something prophesied happens/comes true or not - if not, obviously then the prophet has spoken without the Lords authority and need not be feared. ~

This seems it could present some rather interesting political ploys into a possible motion - if it were that such became a sought after position. ~

Of course it would be with much effort to falsify occurrences - to present illusions so to speak - but presuming a prophet were found and then others laid claim to issued prophesy in a public sense, and managed to sustain the isolation of said prophet, such might become a heated area of contention. ~

In considering this prediction of a coming prophet combined with the provision to put forth a King - such isolation becomes all the more possible given the constraints on the post of King itself within this new social structure among the Israelites. ~

This tends to indicate perhaps a want Moses may have had for such a recognition within the statement of; like me, then considered within a future society possibly putting forward a King. ~

In further considering the idea of King within the presented political atmosphere and in context of the limitations dedicated for the position (as seen in the guidelines) - a person has to recognize the power within such remaining with those being governed. ~

As a difference from other Kings, this version in chapter 17 (guidelines for a king) even keeps the King from accumulating large amounts of monies for himself as King. Suggesting that someone else would have to do it for him if at all. Then presenting further political arena's. In essence, those with the most influence could exalt such a position in variation of King - or conversely leave it destitute and un-tended.

Further, it seems such could be built up only to be removed, as per monetary wealth. ~

This presumably only being able to transpire in failing to apply other social consistencies presented (such as I have explored previously) as applied standard(s). ~

In fact, within such an unchecked application - a King might be exalted and even incredibly efficient for years - only to then be politically assassinated in some other political shift peripherally. ~

Perhaps, as a speculative musing - such is a place of origin for that which is now known as bloodless coupe? ~

If so, then such is undoubtedly another progressive structuring even within the seemingly contained and limited perspective of King being affixed/introduced to otherwise progressively developing atmosphere. ~

As a side note within my journal, I noted that such developments as being socially relative to the previous and common aspect of piracy, plunder and assimilation of that which already exists within those respects. Though obviously, this would then be in the consideration of procuring - incorporating other forms of social structuring into their own as frequently I have explored. Then returning again to the consistency of the established standards within the book of instruction.

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY: 12/14/2006 - continued - (Holy Day? Economics And Atonement? Making Sure That God Gets A Nibble?)

2007-01-31T07:57:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/14/2006

(continued)

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

Holy Day? Economics And Atonement? Making Sure That God Gets A Nibble?

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/14/2006 (continued)

Continuing in chapter 15 of 1 Samuel, it of course states that a first born animal with defect cannot be used as offering - though in this turn of instruction, it is stated that it may be kept and consumed in the home town - and further yet again, anyone ceremonially clean or un-clean may eat of it. ~

Again, in reference to the servant(s) being released - more so in the event that they choose to remain - it is described to pierce their ear against the door frame (where the commandment(s) are presumably displayed), and they will remain as your servant for life. ~

Another rather progressive aspect here-in, is it is said to extend the same treatment (and option) to female servants as well. ~

I find myself again considering the obvious beginnings of consistent value and commerce depicted in these past few passages - and further find in considering the modern dollar in near chide - seeing it from a perspective of In God We Trust then with a somewhat extended meaning in relation to the established consistency (within the inconsistency no less) when compared with the social movements and structure described here, and the resulting stability of commerce. ~

01/31/2007 Again, as note... I tend to see this as example of idea having been introduced into the human perspective long before it becomes presented and implemented in a most efficient form. The similarities within these presented ideas and modern commerce, are strikingly similar in many ways concerning concept. I do not tend to think that the similarities are necessarily purposeful, but more that over the years of development within civilizations... as humans have progressed, a more efficient understanding surfaced pertaining to such directions. Most notably in the presence of idea pertaining to civilization and society beyond the war driven versions of economy so prominent in recent history. To look at these ideas in the context of extendable potential(s) - again, for instance beyond the idea of warring and raiding that was prominent of the day depicted and even until most recent history... perhaps those initial human tendencies and drives were converted even through the further developed idea of commerce itself, into that which we now see as modern commerce (in the more effective and efficient examples). No longer relying upon the war in the spring time to drive the economy.

As further note as I continue my studies, it is reasonable to assert that such developments may even have begun to occur within kingdoms of the day as can be seen briefly depicted in the Story of David for instance... though eventually failed due to a lack in much of what has been socially constructed within the larger development of which we have the benefit of in the modern day - though apparently seldom tend to utilize to an efficient degree. Such of course as is observable, then rendered the cycling and progressive effect of rise and fall coupled with the progression of various forms of despotism progressing within the established structure(s) at a similar rate. Within the example of King David can be seen the progression from plundering for spoils to an established compliment pertaining to worth and value. Even the tendenc(ies) away from dependence upon the yearly war in beginning the exploration of use of celebrity for instance within the aspect of commerce, though still coupled with the idea of religious compliance.

I further feel I should mention the various mimicry's pertaining to both popular Christianity and modern economics in tending a focus on the result of marketing as if it were a driving force of value. ~

The modern atmosphere tending to give the largest consumer body (% of certain purchase for instance), the illusion of being the reason for value itself. These (those) particulars only having an effect on supply and demand, and trend in popularity if anything. Very much things that exist of the moment within that consumer mentality. ~

Things very much easily influenced with the very marketing ploys used to emulate (as a larger unit consideration themselves) the idea of value. ~

01/31/2007 I consider this consistency in the modern day - the modern version of society within the commerce/power marriage, and while it is that it exists to great extremes, a person must consider that it is/was by design at least to some degree - regardless of the extreme mutations which have taken shape. If not only in the interest of creating said illusion for the benefit of the perceived quality of living experience... then perhaps as well in establishing a consistent motion in use of it. A person must consider this from the perspective of considering the presumed attempt in establishing a Utopia in order to get the gist of what I am approaching in this small supplemental note. A part in the idea of Utopia would very much be the perception of such involvement to some extent. The sensation of being an active and integral part of the prosperity which exists. Similar in comparison perhaps with the perceived, though vicarious, sensation of being victorious (and even conquered) in association with sporting events, being admitted to a place of higher learning, some affiliation with a person of celebrity such as autograph(s), etc..... The perceived potential of importance through some relation acting as a similarly important part as would be the actual affiliation with such.

In considering the implementation of such Holy Day activities as are described, in such a consistent way - it shows the social transition in that sense of value from a person/group of people fixing a rigid standard - to a flowing market/commerce potential. ~

Again, though not to go too far on an economic bent - a horde of people wanting something can (and does in the modern day) effect the price of something. But such action (within supply and demand) does not equate to value. ~

Of course, in considering this early area for such potential - supply and demand probably began as smaller (varying portions) of something in the effort to insure that everyone could partake of that offering. Meaning it probably wasn't inflationary in that day and age of charging more if less product was on hand - but more in rationing for the same atonement price to insure the availability in those instances of many people and fewer of a given supply in first born food stuffs (pertaining to the interest in religious compliance as opposed to profitability at the time). ~

From that perspective, it is somewhat of an inversion of the modern motion within supply and demand. This obviously being that in most commerce settings - the product is predisposed to a certain size and amount, where obviously then it is the price that tends to fluctuate - the atonement amount so to speak in comparison - and not the portion. Which, if considered in the context of atonement offering - then would equate to an exclusionary result - which doesn't seem to have been the idea in such group like feasts. A selective dynamic derived from monetary wealth. ~

Of course, the comparison there is hypothetical in regard to common goods and luxuries - but it illustrates the gist all the same. ~

In the religious and ceremonial sense, there is more in the feasting and eating than in the act of purchase. Which again differs from the modern dynamic within that consumer mentality where the purchase is seen as the more important. ~

Chapter 16 in Deuteronomy again describes pass over. Again this version of instructions has been incorporated into the more domestic version of Israelite social movement, in mandating this celebration to transpire in the place the Lord has chosen for worship. ~

of course it is to be accompanied with un-leavened bread (called here the bread of suffering) and it is still a mandate to remove all yeast from the premises. Again, this bread is to be eaten for 7 days. ~

The sacrifice for pass over is stated here as acceptable as either from the flock or heard and is to be sacrificed as the sun sets - then consumed through out that night - none to be consumed the following day. And as well, the Israelites may not return to their tents until morning. ~

Besides this obviously being a lunar celebration - symbolically it could be seen as if they, themselves were consuming the first born (as stated) of Egypt on pass over. ~

Symbolically then likening themselves in that instance, to that Angel of Death sent as result of Moses leveling a curse. ~

In a further symbolic sense then - it would seem perhaps that they even liken themselves in said instance (as a whole) to God - but such symbolic representation/affiliation (if any) would only be insure that the God who lives and walks among them is then partaking of the offering(s). ~

Even further is seen here a relation of the importance on first born animals being the Lords and further being consistently consumed in such ceremonies. ~

It seems that is the strongest symbolic relation with the first born - being the death of first born in Egypt. And yet another duality here, in the first born being the Lords. ~

Are they then eating the Lord? ~

Are they eating the resulting death from the initial pass over? ~

Is it both? ~

What does that suggest of Pharaoh? ~

16:09 begins with instructions for the Harvest Festival to begin 7 weeks from the first cut of grain. Again being augmented to the designated place of worship. Though in this instance it is inferred that no travel is necessary in including foreigners, orphans, widows and Levites from your town, in the celebration. And no sacrifice is described as necessary beyond a proportionate offering of grain (presumably). ~

16:13 describes the Festival Of Shelters - and is similar to that of the Harvest Festival - and especially similar to pass over, being a 7 day festival. ~

This as well, as the Harvest Festival, required no travel and takes place in a rather common atmosphere. ~

16:18 again speaks of appointing judges and officials in all towns and from all tribes. ~

Very much within the idea of representation.

STUDIES IN THROLOGY: 12/14/2006 - (Welfare? Celebration? Value?)

2007-01-30T08:41:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/14/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

Welfare? Celebration? Value?

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/14/2006

Chapter 14:22 of Deuteronomy again references tithes of crops, but in this turn of such instruction is obviously the augmentation to go to the place the Lord selects from one of the tribal territories. ~

This is then said to teach them always to fear the Lord. But such is almost immediately contradicted in then presenting the option - in the case that the chosen place is too far away - to sell the tithe offerings and go to the chosen place - then purchasing any kind of food you want as well as wine and any other alcoholic beverage. This in the interest of feasting and celebrating with your house hold. ~

This is without any question, early example of commerce and hospitality industry beginnings. ~

Not to mention further being support in connection to holiday as is recognized in the modern day. ~

Peculiar that firstly fear would be indicated, then contradicted with celebration. ~

Perhaps more indication of an existing duality. ~

14:28 cites a three year cycle in using the tithe for the Levites. Directing the tithe to be stored in the nearest town for such purposes. ~

It most definitely looks to be an early form of welfare as it was to be used for foreigners, orphans and widows living among the Israelites. This so they can eat and be satisfied. ~

Chapter 15 begins on a note that was probably the first of biblical commands to be left out of modern society and Popular Christianity - it instructs that every seventh year all debts to yourself are to be cancelled. Anyone owing you money is to be released from that debt. It is stated that such applies only to fellow Israelites - not extending to foreigners. ~

This must have some relation with the Sabbath year as well in having it occur every seventh year - and in conjunction with what is referred to at this point as the Lords time of release. ~

In that affiliation and reason (time of release) - is further indication of a cyclical aspect within that larger motion of influence. ~

Perhaps there will be something within the lunar calendar I will notice when it is that I look at it in a manner as to compare. ~

It would seem within that consistency - and further the consistency in appearance of the number 7, that such is a relevant reference to some other occurring consistency. ~

Immediately, simply in considering the fact that only more recently Pluto was seen to be in existence within the solar system, and of course in omitting Earth in that consideration - there are then only 7 planets to consider there. Perhaps none too coincidentally - all being named from references with that prominent multi-deity structure (a variation of) so common in other cultures and civilizations of the time. ~

Perhaps it is that there exists a cyclical occurrence transpiring every 7 years? It would come as no surprise. ~

15:06 describes yet further early insight into larger social consistencies and tendencies - in stating the relationship between controlling/control of a nation(s) - and finance. ~

At the point in time that this is stated - civilizations were only at a point of warring on each other and plundering for bulk spoils. ~

This passage almost - nearly predicts a time when commerce would be precedent over conquering and plunder. ~

Very much I imagine as result of the obvious concerted efforts in the direction of establishing such social consistencies as well as integrated structure and decree toward the development of commerce beyond the trade of goods. ~

Again, in 15:12 is a reference to 7 - this being in regard to indentured servitude and slave servants. Any Hebrew selling themselves as a servant, may serve for 6 years and be released on the 7th year. Further, the servant is not to be sent on their way empty handed as is stated in 15:13. ~

Then, notably as is indicated in 15:14, most all Israelites were presumably cultivators at this point - though it is as of yet that they have ventured Westward. ~

Perhaps it was only presumed that such would be the case? ~

In comparison and from a brief consideration - the time line and ability to release slaves seems similar to that which Justinianus had presented in the Roman Law Of Sale - It gives me pause to consider a closer comparison. Considering the obvious Hebrew influence on the Roman community, it would stand to reason that such ideas would travel as well. ~

In 15:19 is another reference to first born male animals. Again reassuring the agricultural cultivation and further stating that the first born animals are not to be used to work the fields - nor are they to be shorn. they are only to be used as food at the chosen place of worship - as it is stated in that point in time. ~

In thinking about this consistency being established - and further in realizing a problematic area which could ( and probably did) develop pertaining to the purchase of such food stuffs at the place of worship - it probably even began a sort of supply and demand aspect as well. This in realizing that the entire community of Israel would converge on a chosen town/place - though it wouldn't be possible for them all to bring the tithe offering in the form of livestock and goods. In that then, there would be fewer first born animals and goods even, to be used in ceremony/feast. ~

This of course, given a certain area were consistently chosen - would tend to enlarge flocks as well - and further then be left with even a surplus of other parts of the tithe - such as grain(s) and wine (beverages - liquid offering). ~

While it is that such exchange of goods most certainly did not originate in this example - it could be argued that the consistency and the dynamic (design) in which value found stability and support - very much could have. Most definitely the beginnings of a consistency for supply and demand are seen here - though as I have stated, other cultures (civilizations) participated in basic trade of various sorts as well. ~

Perhaps the beginnings of consistency in which to value a coin piece instead of weighing it, even further as result within this example. ~

This being a relevant point in the difference between value in such directions, and supply and demand. ~

While it is that they are relevant/related and perhaps even tightly compacted in the modern day - they (value and supply and demand for instance) still are different (separate) areas of consideration. ~

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY: 12/13/2006 - continued (More Purchased Atonement? Snitch On Your Neighbor?)

2007-01-29T08:06:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity

12/13/2006

(continued)

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

More Purchased Atonement? Snitch On Your Neighbor?

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/13/2006 (continued)

Later in the afternoon - early evening now and after a break from studies. ~

In 12:21 there is another aspect to the decree for traveling to the place of worship in an option - within the event that the chosen place is far away - to butcher and eat what the Lord has given in the hometown. Further in this is that differing from the offering meat at the place of worship - anyone can eat of the meat butchered and presented in the hometown. Whether they are ceremonially clean or un-clean.

In addition to this, it is stated that once God has expanded the territory, meat can be eaten as much as it is wanted. ~

I immediately call to mind the exploratory comparison I am doing regarding a relationship between modern food service and perceived atonement as a matter of course of existence at this point in human social development. ~

If a person removes the agricultural commonality of the biblical time - and then supplants the development of large food chains in the stead - then considers the various paths of/through development that society has taken - and it becomes rather simple to see the influence of this popular form of religious social structure on such progress. ~

Especially regarding fast food in a relation with the meat which either ceremonially clean or un-clean may eat of. ~

As well, this area within Chapter 12 of Deuteronomy may have a direct relation with the extreme degrees of difference between what is known as fine dining and the more common food chain restaurants. ~

More so even beyond that - the pre-prepared food stuffs available canned and in other variations at the market, and restaurants in general. Demonstrating a degree in development cycle generationally between the initial divergence of at home and at the place of worship - and ceremonially clean and un-clean. ~

Further in both areas of such social development is, as previously explored - the purchase aspect in the place of having offering of one's own. ~

In Chapter 13, 13:01 and 13:02 - it describes prophets among you and what to do in considering predicted signs and miracles which may come true. I see an element of this in a different perspective than many might. ~

Since it is that the Bible is describing such as a possibility - then further in considering how scarce the chance of trickery would have been in a society and communities with laws so strict as death being the penalty for promoting any sort of straying from that single point of focus structure - it then gives probability to the existence of a larger influence - even further than a common presence in other cultures of multiple deities. ~

This then supports the idea of having devised a means to concentrate such influence into that single point of focus structure. ~

Further in 13:02 it specifically states that action against them should only be taken in the event that they then attempt to ply such occurrence as means to promote other worship. If they then say.... very much indicates the line of separation being in the use of visions for other ends, than it is in having them and even making predictions. ~

It could also be seen as being a sort of concession in admitting that there are/may be other areas from which such visions arise. ~

Perhaps such is even in the attempt to encourage any sort of occurrences in that way - to be attributed to the Lord if it is that they are used as an influence? ~

13:06 is almost entirely a promotion of an informant sort of bent. Even insisting a person put another to death for such transgression(s). ~

Given what seems to be the developing social and political atmosphere - such a command could prove rather detrimental if unchecked within the social/political atmosphere. Tending toward extortion's and leverage instead of the apparent design in maintaining a close knit community. ~

This seems to contradict to some extent, the previously presented beginnings of a judicial structure - though perhaps would play into it further, in considering the established cities of refuge. ~

In 13:14 it then recants such extreme reactionary measure by then introducing the need to first examine such cases - facts - carefully. Specifically in regard to hearsay. This is presented in regard and reference to entire towns, but a person would think such reasonable investigation would be applied in other instances as well. ~

13:12 happens to draw my consideration in showing the Israelites perhaps not entirely as conquerors - but more, as observed before - as infiltrators bent on imposing their belief structure, and of course, as has been established - slowly expanding their territories. ~

It then continues in 13:15 to instruct the destruction of such towns where-in people lead their fellow cities astray - further, to cleanse the town with fire and burn the plunder, both as offering to the Lord. ~

This is unavoidably comparable to the fate which befell Sodom and Gomorrah - which then indicates yet another version of a relativity - points of contact.

This example version being a dictation to act in a like manner as something which has already transpired as opposed to the common examples thus far of repetition of instruction and revisitation of previous occurrences. ~

The Sodom and Gomorrah occurrence having happened in the time of Abraham - long before the tribes of Israel. ~

Chapter 14 is much pertaining to what can be eaten as ceremonially clean and what cannot - which of course all is then later encompassed in the idea of Christ.

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY; 12/13/2006 (Moses Wanting The Good Ol' Days? On Holy-Day? Sixty-some Percent Tide Flux?)

2007-01-27T08:02:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/13/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

Moses Wanting The Good Ol' Days? On Holy-Day? Sixty-some Percent Tide Flux?

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/13/2006

Chapter 11 of Deuteronomy again illustrates a few areas in the subject of chronological aspects within this work. ~

11:02 depicts a sense of distance and again the suggestion that the Israelites Moses is addressing are the very same that left Egypt - when it has been stated and implied of a generational cycle having transpired since Exodus, from Egypt. ~

11:03 again indicates such in assertions and references to miracles in Egypt against Pharaoh, which is now suggested were witnessed by the Israelites present. It even states Moses as referring to those present as having been the Israelites chased from Egypt. ~

Again, perhaps an example of transference? Perhaps an example of that folding aspect transpiring even within the actions depicted within the writ itself? ~

Then of course is the odd coinciding time line elements; They wandered for 40 years, but Moses died (supposedly) at 120 years - though in other works (versions of the bible) I have seen different references. ~

There is a suggested generational transition and of course a seeming overlap in the linear, chronological sense - an ebb so to speak. A motion a person might use in a brush stroke - perhaps with a pastry bag. ~

I have to muse at this given the lunar calendar aspect(s) and of course the lunar effect on the tides? Is it that there was a similar effect on those developments and the process in compilation? ~

It could be said that such tends toward that multiple/cycling aspect as well. ~

The human body is scientifically said to be comprised of a majority percentage of water. In a more sensitive time - and of course with far fewer pollution and interference aspects which exist in the modern day - it is reasonable that an influence of that sort was present. ~

Again in 11:18 is mention of tying the words/commandments of the Lord to their hands and wearing them on their forehead. This area being another example of that point of contact in the folding sense as it is nearly verbatim with the previous issuance of such decrees. ~

In 11:22 is a statement which, though it is of my own speculation through applying the consistencies thus far, perhaps indicates further application of the diversified aspects of the single point of focus within that inversion previously demonstrated as result of the multiple into single point of focus. This in the statement of show love to the Lord and further to hold tightly to him. ~

It would seem to present the opportunity for use in transference being applied to just about anything a person could hold to through the use more in and of focus than in the importance of any specific effigy representation. ~

A shepherds staff for instance - through and within the applied use of that multiple/single point of focus - could then readily be used in representation (as effigy) through concentrated focus - of holding tightly to him. Again, the focus and intent taking precedence in this dynamic over specific object as representation. ~

11:29 and 11:30 again demonstrate further divergence yet to beset the tribes of Israel - predominantly, as per location - those on the West side of the river. This being done in/through describing two mountains to be used for pronouncing blessing and curse.

One serving as a place for blessing - the other serving as a place to pronounce curse. Gerizim and Ebal, respectively. ~

I should mention that in thought, though to be separated by blessing and curse, they are both still mountains. ~

Further of interest is the instruction in chapter 27 that dictate an altar to the lord to be constructed on Mt. Ebal, and to be celebrated with sacrifices and feasts as well as the stating of curses. ~

Thus far, it is only pronounced blessings having been stated as issued from Gerizim. ~

In 12:05 it begins to describe another social change about to transpire in regard to a chosen place of worship - indicating very much a stationary place to be chosen and utilized in the manner as previously was the Tabernacle. ~

It is stated as to be chosen within one of the tribal territories. ~

This immediately presents another facet (potentially) in the power structure socially, between the tribes. ~

I should mention I find a bit of humor in 12:08 and 12:09, Today you are doing as you please, because you have not yet arrived at the place of rest. ~

This being a statement issued in reference to not yet having entered the land - It poses an amusing - suggested contradiction - in implying that rest and place of rest has to do with something that sounds very not rest like. ~

Further 12:09 on a more serious note - then indicates another fold of sorts in symbolism and metaphoric association perhaps - in stating that the land is to be a special possession of the Israelites. Obviously this suggests some extension in the direction of comparison being the Israelites as the lords special possession. ~

12:11 continues to describe the actions to transpire within the new social dynamic within a more stationary structure. Much of which very much resembles the beginnings of what we now absent mindedly participate in, being holiday. ~

It is stated that things the Lord commands to be brought to the designated place of worship must be done and celebrated there - only at the place the Lord will choose - again, within one of the tribal territories. To celebrate holy day. ~

This very much resembles, yet again - what was previously in our modern day, Mardi Gras (though obviously Mardi Gras is not a moving celebration). ~

But of course in applying the pattern of divergence becoming more noticeable - this then, over time - could very well have developed into various other, and more diffuse applications as well. ~

It even likens yet further - to modern hospitality industry movements and characteristics utilizing them. ~

Further supporting the speculative observations - in 12:17 is a decree forbidding the consumption of such offerings in your home town. Which even further then could be seen as a very early stimulation to commerce, as well - given that this included the tithe. ~

In considering the base motion of such a mandate - simply socially - considering - as in a similar manner with the applied use previously explored of the cycle (and fallow year) within leading up to the year of Jubilee - a person would become no less than intrigued in a combined use in application of the two distinct social motions. Especially in the use of that borrometer resulting aspect of applied ideology into a social atmosphere. ~

The immediate vision is one of vigor in a social sense, to say the least. ~

While it is that I am no social architect, the potentials within such a speculation are no less than exciting to some degree - simply as a matter and course of being human. ~

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY; 12/12/2006 - continued - (Smelted People, Metal Poisoning? Obey Love And Obedience...Kind Of.)

2007-01-26T09:05:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/12/2006

(continued)

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

Smelted People, Metal Poisoning? Obey Love And Obedience...Kind Of.

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/12/2006 (continued)

In 7:22 of Deuteronomy, it again presents suggestion as to the very aspect of assimilating other cultures and civilizations in promising to continue to drive out other nations little by little - and then further confirms a longevity in plan through stating that they will not be cleared away all at once. ~

In 7:25, it states something peculiar pertaining to the silver and gold used for idols within the nations to be conquered. Stating not to covet it or take it because it is detestable to the Lord. ~

This is peculiar in regard firstly, to spoils considerations - then of course in regard to a transference aspect. ~

It signifies a discerned difference between the gold and silver used within the tabernacle, and that used for other idols in other nations. ~

This being somewhat of a progressive development from the previous division of spoils. Perhaps having some reasoning to - in that transference sense - what had been put into it in the manner for instance of Aarons medallion. ~

Odd that such would be the decree when obviously at this point, gold (and even trinkets) have already been accepted by the tabernacle - even as purification offerings as a share of plunder. then further this rings odd in the obvious plans in continuing to conquer.

Then further in 8:13 when speculating on gold and silver multiplying. ~

This would indicate within the juxtaposed positions - that commerce is then seen as a part of the longevity as well as conquering. ~

Perhaps even - purely as speculation - forbidding further plunder of gold and silver at this point even acted to inspire gaining it through other means - such as the development of commerce? ~

In another regard pertaining to transference - it is stated that the idols are detestable to the Lord - even the gold and silver they are made of. ~

In that is a comparison a person must consider in reference to the golden calf having been an idol - then further that moses then put the remnants of the gold used to make it, into the Israelite drinking water. Having them then, in the symbolic aspect - actually consume that which is said to be detestable. Then of course, it becoming of them in the same motion. ~

Would this then mean that the Lords people and special possession are further affiliated with some form of trinket or idol in the Lords personal presence? ~

They have recently been likened to something of iron being taken from a smelter to be made his people and special possession. ~

Such metaphor is substantiated in Chapter 8 with descriptions of punishment to humble and tribulations perhaps likening to tempering iron in that comparison. ~

Which then, in those lines of consideration could be seen as purposeful in the interests of a people to be used in/for battle - which then suggests perhaps that the special comparison - as I touched on previously, could be a sword - metaphorically speaking. ~

Then in the light of recent affiliation with the detestable metal(s) from idols, could then be reasoned a venomous sword at that - the sort which could instill and impart the detestable elements of itself with even the slightest wound? ~

From a scientific reasoning, having forced the Israelites to drink the gold dust of/from the idol, could very much indicate heavy metal poisoning as being a factor in their existence and relationship with that multiple aspect in a single point of focus. ~

They could have just been mad as a hatter. ~

In Chapter 10 of Deuteronomy, there is what looks to be a discrepancy at first pertaining to the Levites carrying the Ark of the covenant.

It puts this duty within a time line association with Aarons death - but, as has been established - the Levites were set apart long before Aarons death, with duties pertaining to the tabernacle. ~

They were said to have been appointed to Aaron initially, to serve in and around the tabernacle. ~

Further still, representing the first born males of the Israelites. ~

In 10:03, it then indicates either the use of transference or Moses beginning to get really foggy in his old age. Perhaps he is even laying claim to previous occurrences?

This of course, in stating that he built the Ark of acacia wood - when actually it is that Bezalel actually did the crafting of the Ark in Exodus 37. ~

In 10:12, there is yet more suggesting the multiple influences within the single point of focus in a change in tone and timbre from the smelter forged people of iron - conquerors, to that of a call to love and obedience.

A tone which is hardly of that which comes from the heart of fire and heart of darkness. ~

The instruction(s) itself in this instance, is uncharacteristically void of impending doom upon violations of the instruction. In fact, it is only stated to obey these commands for their own good. ~

In 10:22, there is an interesting statement in presenting the Israelites as only having been 70 people when they first went to Egypt. ~

Given that such constrained isolation and similar intentions weren't present at the time - a person then has to see a deeper difference between the Israelite structure pertaining to a single point of focus - and the surrounding area. ~

Given that Lot and Esau are from similar backgrounds - such then lends even further to the subtle difference in such single point of focus systems - simply as a matter of course from the previous influence(s) being entirely of a multiple deity structure.

Perhaps, within those subtle differences of Lot, Esau and the Israelites, is a representation of subtle differences within and between the previous multiple deities?

Perhaps even consisting of a motion which could liken to a cycle of sorts pertaining to the (or similar) aspects those separate representations were set forward to address? This within each division (Lot, Esau and Israelites), then as well, between the relation to one another within that larger motion? Each consisting at any given time, of greater or lesser percentages of such influences? ~

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY; 12/12/2006 (A Sociological Trojan Horse?)

2007-01-26T07:28:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/12/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/12/2006

Continuing in the 6th Chapter of Deuteronomy, I find a curious thought in the combined use of the common statement in God lives among you and something in 6:18 pertaining to doing right and good in the Lords sight. ~

This again alludes to a multiple aspect - at least a duality of some sort in suggesting that perhaps God isn't always watching - which then gives more support to the idea within the idea of among you, that perhaps the embodiment can/could actually be/been seen as contained and therefor isolated (limited in vision so to speak). Perhaps even as result in consideration, of that/those efforts in a single point of focus as well as the consistency of concentrating that point of focus through ceremony. ~

The manipulation and containment of connectivity of sorts? ~

Doing right and good in the Lords sight can also be interpreted as mandating - as previously explored - the fulfilment even of those commands issued as curse and prediction. Much similar to the mandate of fulfilling all of the Lords commands... but yet a bit further in making sure that such transpires where the Lord can easily see it as having been done. Such definitely lends a more intriguing aspect to that of duality and further even - as previously examined - seems to coincide with the symbolic split and representation between the mountain dedicated to blessings and that dedicated to curse.

In 6:20 of Deuteronomy, there is more evidence of the surrogate aspect in stating instructions in a way that suggests the Lord will not always be in the same relationship and capacity as is suggested in the current time frame; This as well could be insight into another, larger progression - if not the duality I have explored within the multiple aspects. ~

Why would the Lord not remain consistently among his chosen people? ~

Why would the Lord not remain entirely consistent and constant? ~

This in conjunction with the no less than two other variations of this single point of focus manner of worship (Lot and Esau)- is itself reason to consider the potential duality and multiple aspects - then further, the motion within/of a larger cycle. The difference between the motion of and within our galaxy, and the motion of our galaxy in/on its path through the universe. ~

In Chapter 7 of Deuteronomy, it speaks as though in a past - future tense pertaining to the people having once occupied the land the Israelites are about to enter - complete with more instruction(s) to completely destroy each of them - to show them no mercy even.

As another point of interest - there are listed 7 nations yet to be destroyed at that point - which then indicates again, the marauding tendencies of the community of Israel. ~

Further, this again bolsters the Eastern tribes as a power area - given that these instructions are as if to those going to the West side of the river. This then would indicate more of the soldiering to be done by those much nearer the prospective enemies. ~

It then shows more segregated and genocide like qualities in forbidding the inter-marriage of those nations people (even being conquered) and the Israelites. I presume this was in the interest of preserving and maintaining the newly established belief structure - probably more so than than the interest of preserving blood lines at that point - but, it would seem that from this consistency as it developed through other nations, that the issue of blood line(s) was developed. Then of course, as was discovered through the extreme application of such concerns - new blood is necessary for basic health in reproduction and familial environments. ~

Such is something that tells me the initial intention was in preserving the social and belief structure more so than the strict adherence to such instruction regarding interests in blood line. ~

It is possible then, in that consideration - that the blood line interests (especially in those historic detrimental extremes) was a byproduct of the application of belief structure (within this example social development at least). ~

Aspects of such concerns for structure are evident in a sort of self comparison when examining the efficiency with which this belief structure then infiltrated those structures of nations having conquered it. ~

A sociological Trojan Horse, so to speak in some instances. ~

Then of course, within that interaction producing variations which can still be seen in the modern day. This, in addition to the remaining consistency(ies) of the initial belief structure as it continued to develop. ~

Perhaps in that then, it could be said as an illustration of the resulting effect within that multiple aspect seen as a single point of focus? In the larger sense, the resulting derivatives (presumably from the 3 variations -Jacob{Israel}, Esau, Lot) then representing the more subtle differences within that multiple aspect in result socially - and even between the 3 initial variations presented within the work called the bible? ~

Further in this consideration, is then the effect of those variations of worship related to idols - further yet, the consideration of the Israelites seeming to be encouraged to some degree, though through a contrary sense in curse/prediction, to participate in such forms. The consistency being that they fall away from the Lord for some time, then apparently again return. It can be safely presumed that within such a motion, it was consistent that only certain areas of the Israelite population strayed to such a degree. Always leaving a base area within the social structure. ~

It is known with cultivation, that spores on the seed of another plant life can cause mutations - such then is a similar effect in a larger, ongoing process. ~

In that then, have we retarded our potential progress in those imposed/over controlled instances in progressively removing ourselves from the larger motion of it as it transpires in that non-linear fashion? ~

In Chapter 7:07, it states that the Israelites were chosen because they were the smallest nation - chosen because the Lord loved them and was keeping the oath sworn to their ancestors. ~

In 7:09, it then states that said oath (covenant) is kept for a thousand generations. ~

It was a long time ago that this is said to have transpired and over 2000 years since Christ. ~

What then was to transpire after the 1000 generations? Is it here as well that the idea of Christ serves an unseen, extended service? ~

In such a statement, though at the time 1000 generations probably seemed like forever, is the obvious reasoning that the covenant with the Lord would not be eternally in the literal sense - only for 1000 generations. ~

Is it then that the conquering was to serve another purpose beyond the promise of land in which to live? ~

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY - 12/11/2006 (Commands Were Just Too Difficult to Fit On A Business Card?)

2007-01-25T16:44:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/11/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/11/2006

Deuteronomy 6 begins with more instruction to obey commands the Lord has presented - 6:06 mentions to fill conversations with them when possible. When going to bed and getting up in the morning, which seems to be the beginnings of the common practice of prayer regarding popular Christianity - though it is a widely practiced event to perform such daily ritual. ~

6:08 states in metaphor presumably, to tie them on your hands and wear them on your foreheads as reminders (concerning the commands). ~

I immediately had, yet again - the thought of the more modern rosary and its functions for prayer where the reference to forehead seems to liken to an affiliation with the medallion of the head priest (previously Aaron). ~

Knowing of its function then further presents the potential transference aspect. ~

Though it is a bit of a stretch, the reference in 6:09 to writing them on the door post seems as though it could have a relation to the development of modern addresses. Seeing as each home would most likely have displayed variations of such in that time period. Simply then perhaps progressing with the spread in popularity of such practices through the popularity of Christianity and developing eventually to the more common means of house addresses used. ~

There is another relative aspect in the display of commands on the door post in that part of accepting an alien - a foreigner - into their midst - the person was to be taken to the door post and have their ear pierced with an awl against it. Most definitely a connection in symbolism with such ceremony. ~

In 6:10 of Deuteronomy, it then describes further pirate like aspects of the recent Israelite actions in stating that the land they are about to enter, has large prosperous cities that they did not build. Houses richly stocked with goods they did not produce. ~

An odd aspect considering the previous focus on cultivation, commerce - similar aspects of domestication. ~

Maybe this is more evidence of that split between tribes?

Perhaps those he wasn't necessarily speaking to - those remaining in the East part of the land - were more the dominant cultivators? Seeing perhaps the larger body going to the Western side of the river, to be less industrious in those ways?

It definitely presents (and presents them) as more the consumer than the producer.

It continues to solidify an attribute of this in stating that after they have eaten their fill of this land, not to forget the Lord. ~

6:14 poses a question with reasserting the commitment to God, in stating stating that the Israelites are not to worship the gods of the neighboring nations. ~

What then of the god that Esau's descendants worship, and those of Lot in the same respect?

This presents that multiple facet once again (though slightly in a different manner) and may allude to a containment in reference to the previously explored variations aspect on that larger level - pertaining to elemental (fire, water, ice....) divisions?

Most definitely indicates some form of division in that sense - which ever it may be. ~